Abstract
Many Indigenous people have a deep mistrust of research, with some describing research as one of the “dirtiest” words in Indigenous language. The histories and experiences behind such mistrust are long and painful. Given what has been perceived as Indigenous objectification at the hands of largely Anglo-European others for research from which they fail to benefit, many communities now refuse research unless it is undertaken under certain, Indigenous-defined circumstances. Such refusal is a move away from others purposes and a move towards autonomy and self-determination. For some, this is a statement of sovereignty and it applies to all areas of endeavour, including the new frontiers of research and the structures that support them, such as datification of knowledge. This article examines data sovereignty from the perspective of Indigenous peoples. While data sovereignty has become a ubiquitous concern, Indigenous data sovereignty arises from contexts specific to Indigenous peoples. The focus of this article is to provide a brief overview of recent data sovereignty developments, along with the context that lies behind these activities. Through this examination, implications for trust in scholarly communications will be discussed.
Reference78 articles.
1. The young Joseph Banks: naturalist explorer and scientist, 1766–1772;Agnarsdóttir;J. Maritime Res,2019
2. AkeeR.
AndersonJ.
CarrollS. R.
CousijnH.
HaakL.
HudsonM.
Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Activating Policy and Practice2020
3. Metadata enrichment for digital heritage: users as co-creators;Alemu;Int. Inf. Libr. Rev,2018
4. “Chuck a copyright on it”: dilemmas of digital return and the possibilities for traditional knowledge licenses and labels105126
AndersonJ.
ChristenK.
Museum Anthropol. Rev.72013
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献