Affiliation:
1. Otago Business School, University of Otago, New Zealand
2. Kā Waimaero, Ngāi Tahu Centre, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
3. Faculty of Law, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Abstract
Indigenous people are considering how to safeguard their natural resources, culture and knowledge against illegal, inappropriate or unauthorised use. Such protection is needed to maintain the integrity of Indigenous relationship to and control over such resources, while allowing for potential benefits from such resources to support tribal social and economic development. Using the case study of taramea ( Aciphylla aurea), a sub-alpine speargrass, traditionally used to make fragrance by Ngāi Tahu (a large tribe from the South Island, New Zealand), we assess potential approaches to protection, ranging from national and international intellectual property approaches such as trademarking, copyright and patenting to extra-legal approaches such as supply chain auditing, blockchain, biocultural trademarks and biocultural labels. From this assessment, we evaluate approaches’ usefulness against a range of Indigenous and market-oriented attributes. We find that while each approach has advantages and disadvantages, no one method is superior, so we recommend a mix of approaches.
Subject
History,Anthropology,Cultural Studies
Reference71 articles.
1. Allam L. (2022, July 18). Majority of Aboriginal souvenirs sold are fakes with no connection to Indigenous people, report finds. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/jul/19/majority-of-aboriginal-souvenirs-sold-are-fakes-with-no-connection-to-indigenous-people-report-finds
2. The Biocultural Labels Initiative: Supporting Indigenous rights in data derived from genetic resources
3. Localizing Intellectual Property in the Globalization Epoch: The Integration of Indigenous Knowledge
4. Centralized decentralization for tribal business development