Comparative Economic Evaluation of Data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with Three Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network Microsimulations-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparative Economic Evaluation of Data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with Three Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network Microsimulations

Published:2011-11 Issue:2 Volume:261 Page:487-498
ISSN:0033-8419
Container-title:Radiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Radiology

Author:

Vanness David J.,Knudsen Amy B.,Lansdorp-Vogelaar Iris,Rutter Carolyn M.,Gareen Ilana F.,Herman Benjamin A.,Kuntz Karen M.,Zauber Ann G.,van Ballegooijen Marjolein,Feuer Eric J.,Chen Mei-Hsiu,Johnson C. Daniel

Publisher

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Link

http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/pdf/10.1148/radiol.11102411

Reference68 articles.

1. Accuracy of CT Colonography for Detection of Large Adenomas and Cancers

2. Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting1 1Vital Images Inc. has supported research at UCLA (to D. S. K. L., J. A. B., and E. G. M.). Monex provided support (to M. M.). GE Medical Systems provided software license and research support (to C. D. J., J. A. B., and A. H. D.). Voxar, Inc. produces products that compete with products listed in this paper (to M. A. B.).The study design was approved by the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Computerized tomographic colonography examinations for American College of Radiology Imaging Network Protocol A6656 were submitted by E. G. McFarland, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri; M. Zalis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; C. D. Johnson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; M. Macari, New York University, New York, New York; D. Lu, University of California, Los Angeles, California; A. H. Dachman, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; M. Morrin, Beth Israel/Deaconess Hospitals, Boston, Massachusetts; and J. Yee, Veterans Administration Hospital, San Francisco, California. Workstations for performing computerized tomographic colonography interpretations were loaned to the American College of Radiology (ACR) by General Electric, Vital Images, and the Mayo Clinic. Each provided technical support for installation at the ACR. Computerized tomographic colonography examinations were removed and workstations returned after the study interpretations were completed.

3. Optimization of CT Colonography Technique: Prospective Trial in 180 Patients

4. Colorectal Neoplasia: Performance Characteristics of CT Colonography for Detection in 300 Patients

5. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Is there a place for sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening? A systematic review and critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness models;PLOS ONE;2023-08-18

2. Modeling the Natural History and Screening Effects of Colorectal Cancer Using Both Adenoma and Serrated Neoplasia Pathways: The Development, Calibration, and Validation of a Discrete Event Simulation Model;MDM Policy & Practice;2023-01

3. Cost Effectiveness of Mailed Outreach Programs for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Analysis of a Pragmatic, Randomized Trial;Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology;2022-10

4. Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model;PLOS ONE;2020-12-29

5. Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model;2020-08-31