Geophysical Surveys for Geotechnical Model Reconstruction and Slope Stability Modelling

Author:

Innocenti Agnese12ORCID,Rosi Ascanio3ORCID,Tofani Veronica1,Pazzi Veronica4ORCID,Gargini Elisa5ORCID,Masi Elena Benedetta1ORCID,Segoni Samuele1ORCID,Bertolo Davide6ORCID,Paganone Marco6,Casagli Nicola1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy

2. Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Firenze, 50144 Firenze, Italy

3. Department of Geosciences, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy

4. Department of Mathematics and Geosciences, University of Trieste, 34128 Trieste, Italy

5. Centre of Civil Protection, University of Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy

6. Department of Planning, Soil Defense and Water Resources, Autonomous Region of Valle d’Aosta, Loc. Amérique 33, Quart, 11020 Aosta, Italy

Abstract

Performing a reliable stability analysis of a landslide slope requires a good understanding of the internal geometries and an accurate characterisation of the geotechnical parameters of the identified strata. Geotechnical models are commonly based on geomorphological data combined with direct and intrusive geotechnical investigations. However, the existence of numerous empirical correlations between seismic parameters (e.g., S-wave velocity) and geotechnical parameters in the literature has made it possible to investigate areas that are difficult to reach with direct instrumentation. These correlations are often overlooked even though they enable a reduction in investigation costs and time. By means of geophysical tests, it is in fact possible to estimate the N-SPT value and derive the friction angle from results obtained from environmental seismic noise measurements. Despite the empirical character and a certain level of uncertainty derived from the estimation of geotechnical parameters, these are particularly useful in the preliminary stages of an emergency, when straight data are not available and on all those soils where other direct in situ tests are not reliable. These correlations were successfully applied to the Theilly landslide (Western Alps, Italy), where the geotechnical model was obtained by integrating the results of a multi-parameter geophysical survey (H/V seismic noise and ground-penetrating radar) with stratigraphic and geomorphological observations, digital terrain model and field survey data. The analysis of the triggering conditions of the landslide was conducted by means of hydrological–geotechnical modelling, evaluating the behaviour of the slope under different rainfall scenarios and considering (or not) the stabilisation interventions present on the slope. The results of the filtration analyses for all events showed a top-down saturation mechanism, which led to the formation of a saturated face with a maximum thickness of 5 m. Stability analyses conducted for the same events showed the development of a shallow landslide in the first few metres of saturated soil. The modelling results are compatible with the actual evolution of the phenomenon and allow us to understand the triggering mechanism, providing models to support future interventions.

Funder

Autonomous Region of Valle d'Aosta Functional Center

Theilly landslide in the municipality of Fontainemore

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference122 articles.

1. Landslide Process and Impacts: A Proposed Classification Method;Alimohammadlou;Catena,2013

2. Landslide-Triggering Rainfall Thresholds: A Conceptual Framework;Cepeda;Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol.,2010

3. Winter, M.G. (2019, January 1–6). Landslide Hazards and Risks to Road Users, Road Infrastructure and Socio-Economic Activity. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ECSMGE, Reykjavík, Iceland.

4. Milne Cruden, D. (1996). Landslide Types and Processes, USGS.

5. The Varnes Classification of Landslide Types, an Update;Hungr;Landslides,2014

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3