Affiliation:
1. National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA
2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Abstract
Molecular recognition is fundamental in biology, underpinning intricate processes through specific protein–ligand interactions. This understanding is pivotal in drug discovery, yet traditional experimental methods face limitations in exploring the vast chemical space. Computational approaches, notably quantitative structure–activity/property relationship analysis, have gained prominence. Molecular fingerprints encode molecular structures and serve as property profiles, which are essential in drug discovery. While two-dimensional (2D) fingerprints are commonly used, three-dimensional (3D) structural interaction fingerprints offer enhanced structural features specific to target proteins. Machine learning models trained on interaction fingerprints enable precise binding prediction. Recent focus has shifted to structure-based predictive modeling, with machine-learning scoring functions excelling due to feature engineering guided by key interactions. Notably, 3D interaction fingerprints are gaining ground due to their robustness. Various structural interaction fingerprints have been developed and used in drug discovery, each with unique capabilities. This review recapitulates the developed structural interaction fingerprints and provides two case studies to illustrate the power of interaction fingerprint-driven machine learning. The first elucidates structure–activity relationships in β2 adrenoceptor ligands, demonstrating the ability to differentiate agonists and antagonists. The second employs a retrosynthesis-based pre-trained molecular representation to predict protein–ligand dissociation rates, offering insights into binding kinetics. Despite remarkable progress, challenges persist in interpreting complex machine learning models built on 3D fingerprints, emphasizing the need for strategies to make predictions interpretable. Binding site plasticity and induced fit effects pose additional complexities. Interaction fingerprints are promising but require continued research to harness their full potential.
Reference56 articles.
1. Protein-Protein Recognition;Janin;Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.,1995
2. Du, X., Li, Y., Xia, Y.-L., Ai, S.-M., Liang, J., Sang, P., Ji, X.-L., and Liu, S.-Q. (2016). Insights into Protein–Ligand Interactions: Mechanisms, Models, and Methods. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 17.
3. Binding Affinity in Drug Design: Experimental and Computational Techniques;Kairys;Expert Opin. Drug Discov.,2019
4. Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Predicting Protein–Ligand Interactions;Colwell;Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.,2018
5. Are 2D Fingerprints Still Valuable for Drug Discovery?;Gao;Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,2020
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献