Selective Laser Sintering of Polymers: Process Parameters, Machine Learning Approaches, and Future Directions
-
Published:2024-09-13
Issue:5
Volume:8
Page:197
-
ISSN:2504-4494
-
Container-title:Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JMMP
Author:
Yehia Hossam M.1ORCID, Hamada Atef2, Sebaey Tamer A.34ORCID, Abd-Elaziem Walaa34ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Production Technology, Faculty of Technology and Education, Helwan University, Saray-El Qoupa, El Sawah Street, Cairo 11281, Egypt 2. Kerttu Saalasti Institute, Future Manufacturing Technologies (FMT), University of Oulu, Pajatie 5, 85500 Nivala, Finland 3. Department of Engineering Management, College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 12435, Saudi Arabia 4. Department of Mechanical Design and Production Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
Abstract
Selective laser sintering (SLS) is a bed fusion additive manufacturing technology that facilitates rapid, versatile, intricate, and cost-effective prototype production across various applications. It supports a wide array of thermoplastics, such as polyamides, ABS, polycarbonates, and nylons. However, manufacturing plastic components using SLS poses significant challenges due to issues like low strength, dimensional inaccuracies, and rough surface finishes. The operational principle of SLS involves utilizing a high-power-density laser to fuse polymer or metallic powder surfaces. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the SLS process, emphasizing the impact of different processing variables on material properties and the quality of fabricated parts. Additionally, the study explores the application of machine learning (ML) techniques—supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning—in optimizing processes, detecting defects, and ensuring quality control within SLS. The review addresses key challenges associated with integrating ML in SLS, including data availability, model interpretability, and leveraging domain knowledge. It underscores the potential benefits of coupling ML with in situ monitoring systems and closed-loop control strategies to enable real-time adjustments and defect mitigation during manufacturing. Finally, the review outlines future research directions, advocating for collaborative efforts among researchers, industry professionals, and domain experts to unlock ML’s full potential in SLS. This review provides valuable insights and guidance for researchers in regard to 3D printing, highlighting advanced techniques and charting the course for future investigations.
Reference133 articles.
1. Khedr, M., Hamada, A., Abd-Elaziem, W., Jaskari, M., Elsamanty, M., Kömi, J., and Järvenpää, A. (2023). Effects of wall thickness variation on hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel with lattice Auxetic structures. Materials, 16. 2. Additive manufacturing of WC-Co cemented carbides: Process, microstructure, and mechanical properties;Chen;Addit. Manuf.,2023 3. Chua, C.K., Leong, K.F., and Lim, C.S. (2010). Rapid Prototyping: Principles and Applications, World Scientific. [4th ed.]. 4. Gibson, I., Rosen, D.W., and Stucker, B. (2010). Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing, Springer. 5. Particle-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites (PMC) Fabricated by 3D Printing;Khedr;J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater.,2023
|
|