Abstract
To univocally identify mineral species on the basis of their formula, the IMA-CNMNC recommends the use of the dominant-valency rule and/or the site-total-charge approach, which can be considered two procedures complementary to each other for mineral identification. In this regard, several worked examples are provided in this study along with some simple suggestions for a more consistent terminology and a straightforward use of mineral formulae. IMA-CNMNC guidelines subordinate the mineral structure to the mineral chemistry in the hierarchical scheme adopted for classification. Indeed, a contradiction appears when we first classify mineral species to form classes (based on their chemistry) and subsequently we group together them to form supergroups (based on their structure topology): To date, more than half of recognized mineral supergroups include species with different anions or anionic complexes. This observation is in contrast to the current use of chemical composition as the distinguishing factor at the highest level of mineral classification.
Subject
Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference49 articles.
1. The definition of a mineral;Nickel;Can. Mineral.,1995
2. The IMA Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names: Procedures and guidelines on mineral nomenclature;Nickel;Can. Mineral.,1998
3. On the application of the IMA−CNMNC dominant-valency rule to complex mineral compositions
4. Nomenclature and classification of the spinel supergroup
5. Nomenclature of the amphibole supergroup
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献