Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions

Author:

Héroux Paul1ORCID,Belyaev Igor2ORCID,Chamberlin Kent3,Dasdag Suleyman4ORCID,De Salles Alvaro Augusto Almeida5,Rodriguez Claudio Enrique Fernandez6ORCID,Hardell Lennart78ORCID,Kelley Elizabeth9,Kesari Kavindra Kumar10ORCID,Mallery-Blythe Erica111213,Melnick Ronald L.1415,Miller Anthony B.16,Moskowitz Joel M.17ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada

2. Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 814 38 Bratislava, Slovakia

3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA

4. Biophysics Department, Medical School, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul 34700, Turkey

5. Graduate Program on Electrical Engineering (PPGEE), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90010-150, Brazil

6. Division of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (IFRS), Canoas 92412-240, Brazil

7. Department of Oncology, Orebro University Hospital, 701 85 Orebro, Sweden (Retired)

8. The Environment and Cancer Research Foundation, 702 17 Orebro, Sweden

9. ICBE-EMF and International EMF Scientist Appeal, and Electromagnetic Safety Alliance, Tempe, AZ 85282, USA

10. Department of Applied Physics, School of Science, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland

11. Physicians’ Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment, East Sussex TN6, UK

12. British Society of Ecological Medicine, London W1W 6DB, UK

13. Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association, Scarborough, QLD 4020, Australia

14. National Toxicology Program (Retired), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA

15. Ron Melnick Consulting LLC, North Logan, UT 84341, USA

16. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada

17. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA

Abstract

In the 1990s, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) restricted its risk assessment for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) in seven ways: (1) Inappropriate focus on heat, ignoring sub-thermal effects. (2) Reliance on exposure experiments performed over very short times. (3) Overlooking time/amplitude characteristics of RFR signals. (4) Ignoring carcinogenicity, hypersensitivity, and other health conditions connected with RFR. (5) Measuring cellphone Specific Absorption Rates (SAR) at arbitrary distances from the head. (6) Averaging SAR doses at volumetric/mass scales irrelevant to health. (7) Using unrealistic simulations for cell phone SAR estimations. Low-cost software and hardware modifications are proposed here for cellular phone RFR exposure mitigation: (1) inhibiting RFR emissions in contact with the body, (2) use of antenna patterns reducing the Percent of Power absorbed in the Head (PPHead) and body and increasing the Percent of Power Radiated for communications (PPR), and (3) automated protocol-based reductions of the number of RFR emissions, their duration, or integrated dose. These inexpensive measures do not fundamentally alter cell phone functions or communications quality. A health threat is scientifically documented at many levels and acknowledged by industries. Yet mitigation of RFR exposures to users does not appear as a priority with most cell phone manufacturers.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference144 articles.

1. Anghileri, L.J., and Robert, J. (1986). Hyperthermia in Cancer Treatment, CRC Press. Volumes I–III.

2. Laidler, K.J. (1993). The World of Physical Chemistry, Oxford University Press.

3. Toward a Prescriptive Grammar for the Radiobiology of Non-Ionising Radiations: Quantities, Definitions, and Units of Absorbed Electromagnetic Energy—An Essay;Justesen;J. Microw. Power,1975

4. Frey, A.H. (1994). On the Nature of Electromagnetic Field Interactions with Biological Systems, R. G. Landes Co.

5. (2006). IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz (Standard No. Std C95.1-2005).

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3