Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil
Abstract
This paper explores the dual-processing hypothesis of the mind, Systems 1 and 2, by examining debates between cognitive and evolutionary psychologists. I structure the discussion in a back-and-forth manner to emphasize the differences. I show that, while the majority of cognitive psychologists now embrace the dual-processing theory of the mind, Systems 1 and 2, there are still some who disagree. Most evolutionary psychologists, in contrast, dispute the existence of System 2, a domain-general mind, although some disagree. However, a consensus is growing in favor of System 2, although evolutionary psychologists’ concerns must be addressed. The uniqueness of this review is that it contrasts the perspectives of cognitive psychologists with evolutionary psychologists, which is uncommon in the cognitive psychology literature, which tends to overlook evolutionary viewpoints.
Reference149 articles.
1. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
2. Individual differences in rational thought;Stanovich;J. Exp. Psychol.,1998
3. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning;Sloman;Psychol. Bull.,1996
4. In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning;Evans;Trends Cogn. Sci.,2003
5. Westen, D. (2007). The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation, Public Affairs.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献