Affiliation:
1. Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA
Abstract
Sensory professionals are looking for alternative ways to conduct laboratory sensory testing, especially central location testing (CLT), during the COVID-19 pandemic. One way could be conducting CLTs at home (i.e., in-home testing). It is questionable whether food samples under in-home testing should be presented in uniform utensils, as it does so under laboratory sensory testing. This study aimed to determine whether utensil conditions could affect consumer perception and acceptance of food samples evaluated under in-home testing. Sixty-eight participants (40 females and 28 males) prepared chicken-flavored ramen noodle samples and evaluated them for attribute perception and acceptance, under two utensil conditions, using either their utensils (“Personal”) or uniform utensils provided (“Uniform”). Participants also rated their liking of forks/spoons, bowls, and eating environments, respectively, and attentiveness to sensory evaluation under each utensil condition. Results of the in-home testing showed that participants liked ramen noodle samples and their flavors under the “Personal” condition significantly more than under the “Uniform” condition. Ramen noodle samples evaluated under the “Uniform” condition were significantly higher in terms of saltiness than those evaluated under the “Personal” condition. Participants liked forks/spoons, bowls, and eating environments used under the “Personal” condition significantly more than those used under the “Uniform” condition. While overall likings of ramen noodle samples, evaluated under the “Personal” condition, significantly increased with an increase in hedonic ratings of forks/spoons or bowls, such significant correlations were not observed under the “Uniform” condition. In other words, providing uniform utensils (forks, spoons, and bowls) to participants in the in-home testing can reduce the influences of utensils on consumer likings of ramen noodle samples evaluated at home. In conclusion, this study suggests that sensory professionals should consider providing uniform utensils when they want to focus solely on consumer perception and acceptance of food samples by minimizing influences of environmental contexts, especially utensils, in the “in-home” testing.
Funder
United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Act funding
Subject
Plant Science,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science),Microbiology,Food Science
Reference61 articles.
1. World Health Organization (2022, December 24). WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19—11 March 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020/.
2. World Health Organization (2022, December 24). Numbers at a Glance. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/.
3. Stay safe in your vehicle: Drive-in booths can be an alternative to indoor booths for laboratory sensory testing;Seo;Food Qual. Prefer.,2021
4. Rationing social contact during the COVID-19 pandemic: Transmission risk and social benefits of US locations;Benzell;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,2020
5. Remote testing: Sensory test during COVID-19 pandemic and beyond;Dinnella;Food Qual. Prefer.,2022