Affiliation:
1. Research School of Economics, Australian National University, Acton, Canberra 0200, Australia
Abstract
This paper tests the hypothesis that action-based fiscal consolidations have a negative effect on GDP growth. Using the IMF’s dataset on action-based fiscal consolidations, instrumental variables’ regressions show that action-based fiscal consolidations have a significant positive effect on GDP growth. The instrumental variables’ regressions also show that action-based fiscal consolidations significantly increase investment and productivity. The findings presented in this paper thus strongly reject the hypothesis that action-based fiscal consolidations reduce growth. The paper argues that least squares estimates presented in previous literature suffer from negative reverse causality bias: GDP growth has a significant positive effect on both the likelihood and the magnitude of action-based fiscal consolidations. To uncover causal effects of action-based fiscal consolidations, researchers need to use an instrumental variables approach.
Reference41 articles.
1. Income and Democracy;Acemoglu;American Economic Review,2008
2. The output effect of fiscal consolidation plans;Alesina;Journal of International Economics,2015
3. What Do We Know about the Effects of Austerity?;Alesina;AEA Papers and Proceedings,2018
4. Effects of Austerity: Expenditure- and Tax-based Approaches;Alesina;Journal of Economic Perspectives,2019a
5. Alesina, Alberto, Favero, Carlo, and Giavazzi, Francesco (2019b). Austerity: When It Works and When It Doesn’t, Princeton University Press.