Effects of Austerity: Expenditure- and Tax-based Approaches

Author:

Alesina Alberto1,Favero Carlo2,Giavazzi Francesco3

Affiliation:

1. Alberto Alesina is Professor of Political Economy, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Fellow at the Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research (IGIER), Università Bocconi, Milan, Italy, and also Research Fellow at the Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, United Kingdom.

2. Carlo Favero is Professor of Finance, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy. Fellow at the Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research (IGIER), Università Bocconi, Milan, Italy, and also Research Fellow at the Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, United Kingdom.

3. Francesco Giavazzi is Professor of Economics, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy. Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Fellow at the Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research (IGIER), Università Bocconi, Milan, Italy, and also Research Fellow at the Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

We review the debate surrounding the macroeconomic effects of deficit reduction policies (austerity). The discussion about "austerity" in general has distracted commentators and policymakers from a very important result, namely the enormous difference, on average, between expenditure- and tax-based austerity plans. Spending-based austerity plans are remarkably less costly than tax-based plans. The former have on average a close to zero effect on output and lead to a reduction of the debt/GDP ratio. Tax-based plans have the opposite effect and cause large and long-lasting recessions. These results also apply to the recent episodes of European austerity, which in this respect were not especially different from previous cases.

Publisher

American Economic Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Economics and Econometrics

Cited by 71 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3