Comparing the Productivity of the Latest Models of Li-Ion Battery and Petrol Chainsaws in a Conifer Clear-Cut Site
Author:
Laschi Andrea1ORCID, Neri Francesco2ORCID, Marra Elena2ORCID, Fabiano Fabio2, Frassinelli Niccolò2, Marchi Enrico2ORCID, Paoloni Riccardo2, Foderi Cristiano2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Forestali—SAAF, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Ed. 4., 90128 Palermo, Italy 2. Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali—DAGRI, Università Degli Studi di Firenze, Via San Bonaventura 13, 50145 Firenze, Italy
Abstract
The recent technological development of batteries has allowed the production of powerful tools that are also used in forestry operations. For this reason, this study aimed to compare the performance of two latest chainsaw models in a conifer clear-cut. The examined chainsaws, the battery-powered Stihl MSA 300 and the petrol-powered MS 261 C-M, have comparable power and weight. The overall working times were recorded and then gross, net and felling/processing productivities were quantified. Our findings reported that in a working day (7.4 h gross time), each chainsaw felled and processed an average of 20 trees of 0.64 m3 with an average diameter at breast height of 28 cm. Considering the net productivity, no statistically significant differences were recorded between the two chainsaws. Investigating the productivities on operations conducted using the chainsaws, the battery chainsaw showed a lower average tree-processing productivity than that recorded for the petrol chainsaw. On average, the battery duration was 0.88 h, while the petrol tank duration was 0.97 h. Our study shows that battery chainsaws have great potential in forestry operations; however, considering the actual need for 8 charges per standard workday, optimizing battery management is an important objective for future work.
Reference39 articles.
1. Battery Technology–Use in Forestry;Pandur;Croat. J. For. Eng.,2021 2. Poje, A., and Mihelič, M. (2020). Influence of Chain Sharpness, Tension Adjustment and Type of Electric Chainsaw on Energy Consumption and Cross-Cutting Time. Forests, 11. 3. Huber, M., Hoffmann, S., Brieger, F., Hartsch, F., Jaeger, D., and Sauter, U.H. (2021). Vibration and Noise Exposure during Pre-Commercial Thinning Operations: What Are the Ergonomic Benefits of the Latest Generation Professional-Grade Battery-Powered Chainsaws?. Forests, 12. 4. Neri, F., Laschi, A., Marchi, E., Marra, E., Fabiano, F., Frassinelli, N., and Foderi, C. (2022). Use of Battery-vs. Petrol-Powered Chainsaws in Forestry: Comparing Performances on Cutting Time. Forests, 13. 5. Insights on Motor-Manual Tree Felling in Germany, Recent Developments to Ensure Efficient Operations in Singletree Selection Harvest*;Hoffmann;Eur. J. For. Eng.,2021
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|