A Comparison between the Latest Models of Li-Ion Batteries and Petrol Chainsaws Assessing Noise and Vibration Exposure in Cross-Cutting

Author:

Neri Francesco1ORCID,Laschi Andrea2ORCID,Bertuzzi Lucia3,Galipò Giovanni4,Frassinelli Niccolò1,Fabiano Fabio1,Marchi Enrico1ORCID,Foderi Cristiano1ORCID,Marra Elena1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, Via San Bonaventura 13, 50145 Florence, Italy

2. Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences—SAAF, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze ed, 4, 90128 Palermo, Italy

3. Azienda Usl Toscana Centro Dipartimento della Prevenzione UFC PISLL (Prevenzione Igiene e Sicurezza Luoghi di Lavoro) Firenze 1, Via Chiantigiana 37, 50126 Florence, Italy

4. Arma dei Carabinieri–Raggruppamento Carabinieri Biodiversità–Reparto Biodiversità di Vallombrosa, Vallombrosa, 50066 Florence, Italy

Abstract

Chainsaw operators are exposed to many hazards that can lead to health problems. The two most frequently documented ergonomics threats in the use of chainsaws are noise and vibration exposure. Since the use of battery chainsaws is increasing due to the growing improvements in battery life and power, the study aims to compare the difference in terms of noise emission and vibration levels of the following two new models of chainsaws: the battery-powered Stihl MSA 300 and the petrol-powered Stihl MS 261 C-M. Black pine and European beech logs were cross-cut in order to evaluate both noise and vibration exposure. The results show that the use of battery-powered chainsaws, in comparison to the petrol one, can reduce the daily vibration exposure by more than 51% and the noise dose by 11%. The daily vibration exposure of 1.60 ms−2 and 1.67 ms−2 measured for the battery-powered chainsaw on Black pine and on European beech, respectively, is far from the daily exposure action value set by the EU directives for health and safety requirements (2.5 ms−2). On the contrary, the daily noise exposure for the battery chainsaw was 93 dB(A), exceeding the upper exposure action value of 85 dB(A).

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Forestry

Reference61 articles.

1. Safety and Health in Forest Harvesting Operations. Diagnosis and Preventive Actions. A Review;For. Syst.,2013

2. Picchio, R., Blasi, S., and Sirna, A. (2010, January 16–18). Survey on Mechanization and Safety Evolution in Forest Works in Italy. Proceedings of the International Conference Ragusa SHWA2010, Ragusa Ibla Campu, Italy.

3. Productivity and Cost-Effectiveness of Mechanized and Motor-Manual Harvesting of Grey Alder (Alnus Incana (L.) Moench): A Case Study in Latvia;Prindulis;Small-Scale For.,2015

4. Russell, F., and Mortimer, D. (2005). A Review of Small-Scale Harvesting Systems in Use Worldwide and Their Potential Application in Irish Forestry, COFORD.

5. Biomass Harvesting from Buffer Strips in Italy: Three Options Compared;Spinelli;Agrofor. Syst.,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3