Evaluation of the Reduced Protocol for the Assessment of Rate of Force Development Scaling Factor

Abstract

The rate of force development scaling factor (RFD-SF) has been used to assess neuromuscular quickness. However, the common protocols are lengthy. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the reduced protocol to assess the RFD-SF and its validity in detecting inter-limb asymmetries. Eighteen participants (five females and thirteen males; mean age = 20.8 ± 0.6 years) performed the common and reduced RFD-SF protocols (five isometric pulse knee extensions at 30 and 70% of maximal voluntary contraction). A repeat measure design was employed including one test session of the common protocol and two test sessions of the reduced protocol. Correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the association between the two protocols, while a paired-sample t-test and a Bland–Altman plot assessed whether the reduced protocol provided valid results. The between-day reliability was assessed using an intra-class correlation coefficient, coefficient of variation, typical error of measurement, and paired-sample t-test. The validity to detect asymmetries was checked with the paired-sample t-test. The correlation between RFD-SF obtained using two protocols was significant (p < 0.001) and very large for the dominant (r = 0.71) and non-dominant (r = 0.80) legs. No significant difference occurred between protocols in the RFD-SF for the dominant (p = 0.480, d = 0.17) and non-dominant legs (p = 0.213, d = 0.31). The reliability was acceptable for both legs, with no between-day difference for the dominant (p = 0.393) and non-dominant legs (p = 0.436). No significant difference between the two protocols (p = 0.415, d = 0.19) was found in the detection of inter-limb asymmetries. The results of this study suggest that the reduced protocol could be used as a valid and reliable alternative to the common protocol, as well as to identify interlimb asymmetries.