How AI’s Self-Prolongation Influences People’s Perceptions of Its Autonomous Mind: The Case of U.S. Residents

Author:

Vuong Quan-Hoang1ORCID,La Viet-Phuong12ORCID,Nguyen Minh-Hoang1ORCID,Jin Ruining3ORCID,La Minh-Khanh4,Le Tam-Tri1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Interdisciplinary Social Research, Phenikaa University, Yen Nghia Ward, Ha Dong District, Hanoi 100803, Vietnam

2. A.I. for Social Data Lab (AISDL), Vuong & Associates, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

3. Civil, Commercial and Economic Law School, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China

4. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

Abstract

The expanding integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in various aspects of society makes the infosphere around us increasingly complex. Humanity already faces many obstacles trying to have a better understanding of our own minds, but now we have to continue finding ways to make sense of the minds of AI. The issue of AI’s capability to have independent thinking is of special attention. When dealing with such an unfamiliar concept, people may rely on existing human properties, such as survival desire, to make assessments. Employing information-processing-based Bayesian Mindsponge Framework (BMF) analytics on a dataset of 266 residents in the United States, we found that the more people believe that an AI agent seeks continued functioning, the more they believe in that AI agent’s capability of having a mind of its own. Moreover, we also found that the above association becomes stronger if a person is more familiar with personally interacting with AI. This suggests a directional pattern of value reinforcement in perceptions of AI. As the information processing of AI becomes even more sophisticated in the future, it will be much harder to set clear boundaries about what it means to have an autonomous mind.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,General Psychology,Genetics,Development,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference82 articles.

1. McQuillan, L. (2023, March 04). A Google engineer says AI has become sentient. What does that actually mean?. Available online: https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/ai-consciousness-how-to-recognize-1.6498068.

2. Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know, Routledge.

3. Vuong, Q.-H. (2023). Mindsponge Theory, De Gruyter.

4. AI-generated characters for supporting personalized learning and well-being;Pataranutaporn;Nat. Mach. Intell.,2021

5. Bosses without a heart: Socio-demographic and cross-cultural determinants of attitude toward Emotional AI in the workplace;Mantello;AI Soc.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3