A Deep-Learning-Based Fault Diagnosis Method of Industrial Bearings Using Multi-Source Information

Abstract

In recent years, the industrial motor bearing fault diagnosis method based on deep learning and multi-source information fusion has made some research progress, and research results show that the uncertainty of noise interference and signal measurement error has been improved to a certain extent. However, the multi-source heterogeneous information of industrial motor bearings not only improves the stability and fault tolerance of the bearing fault diagnosis model but also brings conflicts in information fusion. If the conflicts caused by multi-source information cannot be reasonably resolved, it will be difficult to make further judgments on the bearing faults of industrial motors. Therefore, solving the multi-source information conflict effectively while fully using the complementarity of bearing multi-source heterogeneous information is an urgent problem to be solved in developing industrial motor-bearing fault diagnosis technology. This paper proposes an industrial motor bearing fault diagnosis algorithm based on multi-local model decision conflict resolution (MLMF-CR) to fully integrate multi-source heterogeneous information and reasonably resolve multi-source information conflicts. After the initial characteristic signal selection and cleaning of the vibration and current signals of industrial motor bearings, the algorithm deeply excavates the characteristic information of the bearing signals in each fault state through the local fault diagnosis model based on the bidirectional long short-term memory network (Bi-LSTM) and forms a local diagnosis. After the decision is made, evidence theory is used for fusion. In addition, the high conflict situation that may occur in the process of decision-making fusion is also considered. To this end, the trust degree distribution is introduced to reduce information conflict. Specifically, according to the difference in the sensitivity and reliability of bearing faults under different operating environments or specific conditions, the degree of difference in faults is refined into balanced sensitivity and unbalanced sensitivity. When the fault sensitivity is balanced, the trust of different information sources is quantified by support and uncertainty. When the sensitivity is unbalanced, gray relational analysis is used to assign trust degrees to different information sources. The algorithm can effectively resolve the high degree of conflict in the decision-making fusion process while considering the complementarity of multi-source heterogeneous information. Experiments evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method.