Affiliation:
1. Department of Food Technology and Nutrition, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland
2. Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-631 Wroclaw, Poland
Abstract
The study concerns the effect of wheat germ expeller (WGE) as a feed additive given to male Ross-308 broiler chickens on their meat’s energy and nutritional value, and coverage of nutrient reference values-requirements (NRV-R) of consumers for particular minerals. The chickens in the control group (CT—Control Treatment) were fed a standard complete mix. The experimental groups (EX5, EX10, EX15) were given a feed in which wheat middling was replaced with 5, 10, and 15% WGE. The breast and thigh muscles of 32 randomly selected chickens (8 in each group) were analyzed. More water, crude protein, P, Mg, Fe, Cu, and Mn were determined in the breast muscles, and more crude fat, crude ash, Ca, and Zn in the thigh muscles. Chickens from the CT group consumed significantly (p ≤ 0.01) less feed per body weight than those from groups EX5 to EX15, but achieved the highest body weight per 100 g of consumed feed. A higher (p ≤ 0.01) feed, energy, crude protein, and crude fat intake was observed in groups EX5 to EX15 compared to CT. The higher (p ≤ 0.01) value of protein efficiency ratios was indicated in the CT group. The WGE additive did not impact the muscles’ energy values but affected the nutritional value. The daily consumption of 100 g of breast muscles to a large extent covers the consumer NRV-R for P, Mg Fe, Cu, and Mn. However, thigh muscles cover the NRV-R to a greater extent for Ca and Zn. The EX15, EX5, and EX10 muscles covered most of the NRV-R for P, Ca, and Mg, while the CT muscles did the same for Zn and Mn. Adding 5% WGE to broiler feed is optimal as it does not impair the nutritional value of the muscles.
Funder
the Ministry of Education and Science in Poland
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference45 articles.
1. Poultry Feed Availability and Nutrition in Developing Countries;Ravindran;Poult. Dev. Rev.,2013
2. FAO (2022, May 01). FAO Statistics. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize.
3. FAO (2022). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2022–2031, OECD Publishing.
4. (2022, May 01). Polish Export of Agricultural and Food Products, Available online: https://www.kowr.gov.pl/uploads/pliki/analizy/handel_zagraniczny/Polskieksportproduktówrolno-spożywczychw2020r._rozszerzony.pdf.
5. Del Bosque, C.I.E., Spiller, A., and Risius, A. (2021). Who Wants Chicken? Uncovering Consumer Preferences for Produce of Alternative Chicken Product Methods. Sustainability, 13.