Validation of an Automated Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for the Quantification of Major OCT Parameters in Diabetic Macular Edema

Author:

Midena Edoardo12,Toto Lisa3ORCID,Frizziero Luisa1ORCID,Covello Giuseppe4ORCID,Torresin Tommaso1ORCID,Midena Giulia2ORCID,Danieli Luca2ORCID,Pilotto Elisabetta1ORCID,Figus Michele4ORCID,Mariotti Cesare5,Lupidi Marco5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy

2. IRCCS—Fondazione Bietti, 00198 Rome, Italy

3. Ophthalmology Clinic, Department of Medicine and Science of Ageing, University G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy

4. Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy

5. Eye Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL)-based systems have gained wide interest in macular disorders, including diabetic macular edema (DME). This paper aims to validate an AI algorithm for identifying and quantifying different major optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers in DME eyes by comparing the algorithm to human expert manual examination. Intraretinal (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) detection and volumes, external limiting-membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, and hyperreflective retina foci (HRF) quantification were analyzed. Three-hundred three DME eyes were included. The mean central subfield thickness was 386.5 ± 130.2 µm. IRF was present in all eyes and confirmed by AI software. The agreement (kappa value) (95% confidence interval) for SRF presence and ELM and EZ interruption were 0.831 (0.738–0.924), 0.934 (0.886–0.982), and 0.936 (0.894–0.977), respectively. The accuracy of the automatic quantification of IRF, SRF, ELM, and EZ ranged between 94.7% and 95.7%, while accuracy of quality parameters ranged between 99.0% (OCT layer segmentation) and 100.0% (fovea centering). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient between clinical and automated HRF count was excellent (0.97). This AI algorithm provides a reliable and reproducible assessment of the most relevant OCT biomarkers in DME. It may allow clinicians to routinely identify and quantify these parameters, offering an objective way of diagnosing and following DME eyes.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference36 articles.

1. Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Projection of Burden through 2045: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis;Teo;Ophthalmology,2021

2. Global epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, incidence, and risk factors;Song;J. Glob. Health,2019

3. International Diabetes Federation (2023, January 27). About Diabetes: Diabetes Facts and Figures. Available online: https://www.idf.org/aboutdiabetes/what-is-diabetes/facts-figures.html.

4. Prevalence, incidence and future projection of diabetic eye disease in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Li;Eur. J. Epidemiol.,2020

5. Diabetic Macular Edema: Pathophysiology and Novel Therapeutic Targets;Das;Ophthalmology,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3