Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data

Author:

Shukla Anubhav12ORCID,Prasad Anup K.1ORCID,Mishra Sameeksha1ORCID,Vinod Arya1ORCID,Varma Atul K.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Photogeology and Image Processing Laboratory, Department of Applied Geology, Indian Institute of Technology, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad 826004, India

2. Coal Geology and Organic Petrology Laboratory, Department of Applied Geology, Indian Institute of Technology, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad 826004, India

Abstract

High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm−1) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R2) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (SCHNS, wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (SFTIR, wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide.

Funder

DST

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference81 articles.

1. Organic Petrology of Source Rocks, History and State of the Art;Org. Geochem.,1986

2. Taylor, G.H., Teichmüller, M., Davis, A., Diessel, C.F.K., Littke, R., and Robert, P. (1998). Organic Petrology, Schweizerbart Science Publishers.

3. Suarez-Ruiz, I., and Crelling, J.C. (2008). Applied Coal Petrology: The Role of Petrology in Coal Utilization, Academic Press.

4. The Chemical Forms of Sulfur in Coal: A Review;Calkins;Fuel,1994

5. Bodily, D.M., Wann, J.-P., Chen, W., Zhu, X., Hu, W., and Wadsworth, M.E. (1991). 1991 International Conference on Coal Science Proceedings, Proceedings of the International Conference on Coal Science, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 16–20 September 1991, Elsevier.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3