DTMethod: A New Evidence-Based Design Thinking Methodology for Effective Teamwork

Author:

Dukala Karolina1ORCID,Pyrkosz-Pacyna Joanna2ORCID,Czarny Rafał3

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Psychology in Katowice, SWPS University, 03-815 Warszawa, Poland

2. Faculty of Humanities, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

3. Inprogress, 31-351 Kraków, Poland

Abstract

Design thinking (DT) emerged as a popular method of problem solving and idea generation in creative teams. However, despite the rapid increase in interest in DT as a practical tool, evidence for its effectiveness is rather scarce. Furthermore, neither the theory underlying the methods used in DT nor the definition of DT is coherent. As such, we have decided to introduce a new approach to DT by designing an evidence-based methodology and testing its efficacy among teams working on a specific task. In this article, we present the design thinking method (DTMethod), developed by an interdisciplinary team of practitioners and academics. We also present empirical evidence on the effectiveness of the DTMethod in the teamwork setting. In our study of 39 teams, we found that by using the DTMethod teams achieved more favorable results in terms of utility and meeting set requirements but not in terms of cost or time efficiency. We also found that individuals working according to the DTMethod reported experiencing less positive emotional states but were, overall, more satisfied with the experience and rated teamwork more favorably in terms of cohesiveness and team effort.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference39 articles.

1. Archer, L.B. (1965). Systematic Method for Designers, Council of Industrial Design.

2. Design Thinking;Brown;Harv. Bus. Rev.,2008

3. From the Editors: Managing by Design;Gruber;Acad. Manag. J.,2015

4. Martin, R.L. (2009). The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage, Harvard Business Press.

5. Meinel, C., Leifer, L., and Plattner, H. (2011). Design Thinking, Springer.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3