Abstract
AbstractThis study investigates the utilization of design thinking by a university instructor in the development and delivery of an interdisciplinary curriculum. It examines the challenges encountered and the coping strategies employed during the process. The research, conducted as a case study of an interdisciplinary program course at a university in southern Taiwan from September to December 2022, involved data collection through field observations, in-depth interviews, and document analysis. All data were transcribed verbatim, coded, and triangulated to enhance research validity. The findings suggest that design thinking serves as an effective methodology for interdisciplinary curriculum design and teaching. It emphasizes the integration of practice and application to facilitate students’ interdisciplinary collaboration and co-creation. Additionally, the study evaluates teaching strategies, with a focus on the role of visual tools, communication, and on-site observation. The insights gained from this research provide valuable perspectives on challenges in interdisciplinary teaching, particularly in a post-pandemic context. They guided the development of effective practices in Taiwan and beyond, addressing crucial aspects such as the roles of instructors, resource allocation, and the cultivation of interdisciplinary talent. The study emphasizes the continuous need for adaptation and the prioritization of depth in learning outcomes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Berasategi N, Aróstegui I, Jaureguizar J, Aizpurua A, Guerra N, Arribillaga-Iriarte A (2020) Interdisciplinary learning at university: assessment of an interdisciplinary experience based on the case study methodology. Sustainability 12:7732. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187732
2. Biasutti M, EL-Deghaidy H (2014) Interdisciplinary project-based learning: an online wiki experience in instructor education. Technol Pedagog Educ 24(3):339–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.899510
3. Brown T (2008) Design thinking. Harvard Bus Rev 2008:84–92
4. Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. HarperCollins, New York
5. Carpenter SL, Delugach HS, Etzkorn LH, Farrinton PA, Fortune J, Utley DR, Virani SS (2007) A knowledge modeling approach to evaluating student essays in engineering courses. J Eng Educ 96(3):227–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00932.x