Author:
van Gunst Annelies,Roodenburg Annet J.C.
Abstract
Food additives (E-numbers) are allowed in foods, but many consumers have a negative perception of them. The objective was to study the opinion of food experts about the causes and ways to reduce consumer distrust about E-numbers. Thirteen food experts from universities, research institutes, the government, food industry organisations, media, a nutrition information organisation, a consumer association and two other non-governmental organisations (NGOs) were interviewed with a semi-structured topic list, based on a model of risk perception. Interviews were transcribed, coded by an open-coding approach and analysed. Results indicated that, according to food experts, consumer distrust of E-numbers arose from negative communication by traditional media, social media and books. Food experts suggested that the information sources and the reliability of E-number information are important for consumers. Food experts also suggested reducing consumer distrust by avoiding negative label claims and making collective agreements with all parties about honest and transparent communication. According to interviewed food experts, food companies need to explain clearly and honestly why they use E-numbers in food. A nutrition information organisation and the government were often mentioned as appropriate parties to undertake action. The interviews suggested that consumers had no confidence in the food industry.
Subject
Plant Science,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health(social science),Microbiology,Food Science
Reference52 articles.
1. Food Additiveshttps://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/food-additives
2. The future relationship between the media, the food industry and the consumer
3. Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on Food Additiveshttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:354:0016:0033:en:PDF
4. The consumer’s perception of artificial food additives: Influences on acceptance, risk and benefit perceptions
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献