FEA Assessment of Contact Pressure and Von Mises Stress in Gasket Material Suitability for PEMFCs in Electric Vehicles
-
Published:2023-09-14
Issue:5
Volume:8
Page:116
-
ISSN:2411-5134
-
Container-title:Inventions
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Inventions
Author:
Park Soo-Hyun1, Kareem Akeem Bayo12ORCID, Joo Woo Jeong3, Hur Jang-Wook12
Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi-si 39177, Republic of Korea 2. Department of Aeronautics, Mechanical and Electronic Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, 61 Daehak-ro, Gumi-si 39177, Republic of Korea 3. Pyung Hwa Oil Seal Co. Limited, 597, Nongong-ro, Nongong-eup, Dalseong-gun, Daegu 42982, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Ensuring the safety of electric vehicles is paramount, and one critical concern is the potential for hazardous hydrogen fuel leaks caused by the degradation of Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) gasket materials. This study employs advanced techniques to address this issue. We leverage Finite Element Analysis (FEA) to rigorously assess the suitability of gasket materials for PEMFC applications, focusing on two crucial conditions: ageing and tensile stress. To achieve this, we introduce a comprehensive “dual degradation framework” that considers the effects of contact pressure and von Mises stress. These factors are instrumental in evaluating the performance and durability of Liquid Silicon Rubber (LSR) and Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) materials. Our findings reveal the Yeoh model as the most accurate and efficient choice for ageing simulations, boasting a minimal Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and computational time of just 0.27 s. In contrast, the Ogden model, while accurate, requires more computational resources. In assessing overall model performance using MAE, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and R-squared metrics, both LSR and EPDM materials proved promising, with LSR exhibiting superior performance in most areas. Furthermore, our study incorporates uniaxial tensile testing, which yields RMSE and MAE values of 0.30% and 0.40%, respectively. These results provide valuable insights into material behaviour under tensile stress. Our research underscores the pivotal role of FEA in identifying optimal gasket materials for PEMFC applications. Notably, LSR is a superior choice, demonstrating enhanced FEA modelling performance under ageing and tensile conditions. These findings promise to significantly contribute to developing safer and more reliable electric vehicles by advancing gasket material design.
Funder
the Technology Innovation Program
Subject
General Engineering
Reference66 articles.
1. Hydrogen fuel and fuel cell technology for cleaner future: A review;Singla;Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.,2021 2. Manoharan, Y., Hosseini, S.E., Butler, B., Alzhahrani, H., Senior, B.T.F., Ashuri, T., and Krohn, J. (2019). Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles; Current Status and Future Prospect. Appl. Sci., 9. 3. Decarbonising energy: The developing international activity in hydrogen technologies and fuel cells;John;J. Energy Chem.,2020 4. Current status and future perspectives of proton exchange membranes for hydrogen fuel cells;Jamil;Chemosphere,2022 5. Pourrahmani, H., Siavashi, M., Yavarinasab, A., Matian, M., Chitgar, N., Wang, L., and Van herle, J. (2022). A Review on the Long-Term Performance of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: From Degradation Modeling to the Effects of Bipolar Plates, Sealings, and Contaminants. Energies, 15.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|