Affiliation:
1. Department of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 42121 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Abstract
The identification of opinion leaders is a matter of great significance for companies and authorities, as these individuals are able to shape the opinions and attitudes of entire societies. In this paper, we consider X (formerly Twitter) as a passive sensor to identify opinion leaders. Given the unreliability of the traditional follower count metric due to the presence of fake accounts and farm bots, our approach combines the measures of visibility and community engagement to identify these influential individuals. Through an experimental evaluation involving approximately 4 million tweets, we showed two important findings: (i) relying solely on follower count or post frequency is inadequate for accurately identifying opinion leaders, (ii) opinion leaders are able to build community and gain visibility around specific themes. The results showed the benefits of using X as a passive sensor to identify opinion leaders, as the proposed method offers substantial advantages for those who are involved in social media communication strategies, including political campaigns, brand monitoring, and policymaking.
Reference59 articles.
1. Katz, E., and Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1956). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications, Routledge.
2. Weimann, G. (1994). Influentials, The: People Who Influence People, State University of New York Press.
3. Content Bias in Online Health Search;White;ACM Trans. Web,2014
4. Instagram influencer definitions and the need for dermatologist engagement on social media;Ranpariya;J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.,2020
5. Montangero, M., and Furini, M. (2015, January 9–12). TRank: Ranking Twitter users according to specific topics. Proceedings of the 2015 12th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献