Reconceptualizing ICTD: Prioritizing Place-Based Learning Experiences, Socio-Economic Realities, and Individual Aspirations of Young Students in India

Author:

Pathak-Shelat Manisha1ORCID,Bhatia Kiran Vinod2

Affiliation:

1. Mudra Institute of Communications, Ahmedabad 380058, India

2. Department of Media and Culture Studies, University of Utrecht, 3512 EV Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

This paper critically examines the neo-liberal conceptualization of Information and Communication Technology for Development (ICTD), which imposes the linear and simplistic notions of empowerment and development on the users from the global South. Using the rapidly growing EdTech segment in India as a case, this paper observes that EdTech has been touted as a magic multiplier and a savior for countries like India that aspire to educate their large populations. This has prompted EdTech companies to pursue platformization and templatization to accomplish scalability and standardization in EdTech use. Based on immersive ethnographic research with youth from low-income families in three Indian cities—Ahmedabad, Delhi, and Vadodara—we argue that the practices of young people concerning EdTech resist standardization. Our analysis reveals that three major factors—challenges of access and autonomy, continued relevance of place-based learning and in-person interactions, and uneven quality and rigor—influence low-income students and families to not completely buy the promise of access, equity, and quality that EdTech companies and governments advance. We explore the significance of the socio-economic and cultural contexts of young learners in the global South context and argue that they aspire for personalization, place-based experiences, guidance/mentorship, high grades, and in-person interactions instead of standardization. They do not fully benefit by the experimentation, DIY practices, and tech-lead learning opportunities and resources offered by EdTech platforms in their current state.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference48 articles.

1. Andersson, Anika, and Hatakka, Mathias (, January May). What are we doing? Theories used in ICTD research. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Ocho Rios, Jamaica.

2. Arora, Payal (2019). The Next Billion Users: Digital Life Beyond the West, Harvard University Press.

3. Digital leisure for development: Reframing new media practice in the Global South;Arora;Media, Culture & Society,2013

4. IT as an institutional actor in developing countries;Avgerou;The Digital Challenge: Information Technology in the Development Context,2003

5. Avgerou, Chrisanthi, and Madon, Shirin (2004). Framing IS studies: Understanding the social context of IS innovation. The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors, and Contexts, Oxford Academic.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3