Development of a Tool for Navigating the Evidence concerning Land Managers and Woodland Creation in the United Kingdom

Author:

Petrokofsky Gillian123ORCID,Dunn Michael4ORCID,Edwards David4,Harvey William J.15ORCID,Hemery Gabriel E.2ORCID,Marshall Harry4ORCID,McConnachie Stephen4ORCID,Petrokofsky Leo1,Watts Kevin67ORCID,Ambrose-Oji Bianca8

Affiliation:

1. Oxford Systematic Reviews LLP, Oxford OX2 7DL, UK

2. Sylva Foundation, Little Wittenham, Oxfordshire OX14 4RA, UK

3. Long-Term Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK

4. Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, UK

5. School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2PG, UK

6. Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, UK

7. Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK

8. Forest Research, 620 Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1EJ, UK

Abstract

Woodland creation has become an important objective for a variety of stakeholders to help tackle the climate and biodiversity crises. One of the key evidence needs is a better understanding of the multiple factors influencing the willingness and ability of landowners and managers to establish new woodlands. To address this gap, a systematic map of evidence was prepared comprising publications from academic journals and grey literature accessed through bibliographic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, and CAB Abstracts), libraries, direct requests to relevant organisations and individuals, and citation tracking from past reviews. A screening process refined the evidence base to 226 studies within the UK. The systematic evidence map codes the content of each study against a comprehensive list comprising actors, drivers of or barriers to woodland creation, and outcomes. These are presented as a freely accessible, interactive online dashboard detailing sources of evidence. The systematic evidence map helps users navigate the evidence, demonstrating where the bulk of the evidence lies and, conversely, several evidence gaps where there is comparatively little evidence. The findings serve as a basis for dialogue with stakeholders to determine priorities for future primary research.

Funder

governments of England, Scotland and Wales

Defra Nature for Climate Fund

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Forestry

Reference27 articles.

1. Ecosystem Restoration is Now a Global Priority: Time to Roll up our Sleeves;Aronson;Restor. Ecol.,2013

2. The global tree restoration potential;Bastin;Science,2019

3. Trees as Nature-Based Solutions;Griscom;One Earth,2020

4. Time, space, place, and the Bonn Challenge global forest restoration target;Verdone;Restor. Ecol.,2017

5. BEIS (2020). Department for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy 2020, HM Government.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3