Affiliation:
1. College of Economics & Management, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832029, China
2. College of Information Science & Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832029, China
Abstract
Oasification and desertification are two essential processes of land use and cover (LULC) change in arid regions. Compared to desertification, which is widely regarded as the most severe global ecological issue, the importance of oasification has not received universal recognition. However, neglecting oasification can lead to detrimental outcomes to the effectiveness of ecological governance by affecting the comprehensiveness of environmental policies proposed only based on desertification. Therefore, this study incorporates oasification into the examination of desertification by analyzing land use data for five representative periods spanning from 1980 to 2020, as well as socioeconomic and environmental data from 2000 to 2010. The aim is to evaluate the spatial and temporal dynamics of oasification and desertification in the Manas River Basin and identify the underlying factors driving these processes. The findings indicated that (1) the general trend of oasification and desertification exhibited the expansion of oases and the retreat of deserts. Specifically, the oasification area showed a “decrease-increase-decrease” pattern over time, while the desertification area consistently decreased. (2) In terms of spatial distribution, oasification and desertification displayed a transition from scattered and disordered patterns to an overall more organized pattern, with the hotspot area of desertification shifting from Shawan County to Manas County over time. (3) Population density, average land GDP, soil type and annual precipitation significantly influenced the degree of oasification, with driving force q-values above 0.4, which were the key factors driving oasification. Population density and average land GDP significantly affected the degree of desertification, with driving force q-values above 0.35, which were the key factors driving desertification. The driving force of all factors increased significantly after the interaction, and socioeconomic factors influenced oasification and desertification more than other factors. The study’s findings aim to provide a scientific basis for land resource use, ecological governance and sustainable development in the Manas River basin.
Funder
Corps Social Science Foundation of China
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference64 articles.
1. Review and Prospect of Research on Oasification and desertification in Arid Regions;Wang;J. Desert. Res.,2009
2. Shen, W., Zheng, Z., Qin, Y., and Li, Y. (2020). Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Force of Ecosystem Health in an Important Ecological Function Region in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.
3. Monforte, P., and Ragusa, M.A. (2022). Temperature Trend Analysis and Investigation on a Case of Variability Climate. Mathematics, 10.
4. Briassoulis, H. (2019). Combating Land Degradation and Desertification: The Land-Use Planning Quandary. Land, 8.
5. Desertification and development: Some broader contexts;Kirkby;J. Arid. Environ.,2021