Manual and Device-Assisted Hamstring Autograft Tensioning Yield Similar Outcomes following ACL Reconstruction

Author:

Piskopakis Andreas12ORCID,Totlis Trifon34ORCID,Achlatis Vlasios4,Zampeli Frantzeska1,Georgoulis Jim Dimitris5,Hantes Michael6ORCID,Piskopakis Nikolaos12,Vekris Marios7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, KAT General Hospital, 14561 Kifissia, Greece

2. Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Injuries, Medical Center of Athens, 15125 Marousi, Greece

3. Thessaloniki Minimally Invasive Surgery (TheMIS) Orthopaedic Center, St. Luke’s Hospital, 55236 Thessaloniki, Greece

4. Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

5. First Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece

6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Trauma, University Hospital of Larissa, 41334 Larissa, Greece

7. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece

Abstract

The optimal initial graft tension during ACL reconstruction is still a matter of debate. Manual tension is commonly applied to the graft during tibial fixation. However, this has been associated with a greater graft failure rate than that associated with device-assisted tensioning. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes between the application of manual tension and the use of the ConMed Linvatec SE™ Graft Tensioning System during graft fixation while performing anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted between September 2015 and May 2017. Sixty-four patients (mean age 29.3 years, range 14–45) with isolated ACL injuries (and who would be subjected to ACL reconstruction with a quadruple hamstring tendon graft) were divided into two groups. In Group A (n = 29), common tension was applied manually to both grafts. In Group B (n = 35), specific tension was applied to the grafts with the use of a tensioner device (ConMed Linvatec SE™ (Stress Equalization) Graft Tensioning System). A total of 60 N was applied to the semitendinosus, and 40 N was applied to the gracilis. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months. Results: There were no significant differences between the baseline demographic and clinical data among the patients of the two groups (all p > 0.05). The patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months (mean ± SD). There were no significant differences in the side-to-side anterior knee laxity, the IKDC, the Lysholm Knee, and the Tegner Activity Scale scores for up to 24 months after operation. The pivot shift test was negative in all cases, and no graft failure was reported at a 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: No significant differences were found with respect to postoperative anterior knee laxity, clinical outcomes, activity level, and patient satisfaction between the application of manual tension and the use of the graft-tensioning system during tibial fixation while performing anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with a quadruple hamstring tendon graft. Further high-quality clinical studies are required to elucidate whether device-assisted tension is superior to manual tension.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3