Impact of In-Feed versus In-Water Chlortetracycline and Tiamulin Administrations on Fecal Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Campylobacter in a Population of Nursery Pigs

Author:

Ishengoma Victor L.1,Amachawadi Raghavendra G.1ORCID,Tokach Mike D.2,Shi Xiaorong3,Kang Qing4,Goodband Robert D.2,DeRouchey Joel2,Woodworth Jason2ORCID,Nagaraja Tiruvoor G.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA

2. Department of Animal Sciences & Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA

3. Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA

4. Department of Statistics, College of Arts and Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacteria is a major public health concern in the US and around the world. Campylobacter is an important foodborne pathogen that resides in the gut of pigs and is shed in feces, with the potential to be transmitted to humans. In pigs, the oral route, either in-feed or in-water, is by far the most common route of administration of antimicrobials. Because the distribution of the antibiotic in the gut and the dosages are different, the impact of in-feed vs. in-water administration of antibiotics on the development of AMR is likely to be different. Therefore, a study was conducted to compare in-feed vs. in-water administrations of chlortetracycline (CTC) and/or tiamulin on fecal prevalence and AMR profiles of Campylobacter among weaned nursery piglets. A total of 1,296 weaned piglets, allocated into 48 pens (27 piglets per pen), were assigned randomly to six treatment groups: Control (no antibiotic), in-feed CTC, in-water CTC, in-feed tiamulin, in-water tiamulin, or in-feed CTC and tiamulin. Fecal samples were collected randomly from 5 piglets from each pen during the pre-treatment (days 0, 7), treatment (days 14, 21), and post-treatment (days 28, 35) phases. Bacterial isolations and species identifications were conducted by culture and PCR, respectively. The microbroth dilution method with SensititreTM plates was used to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance of Campylobacter isolates. The results on resistance were interpreted based on the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) epidemiological cutoff values for Campylobacter. The overall prevalence of Campylobacter was 18.2% (262/1440). Speciation of Campylobacter isolates by PCR indicated the prevalence of only two species: Campylobacter hyointestinalis (17.9%; 258/1440) and C. coli (0.3%; 4/1440). Campylobacter isolates were resistant to tetracycline (98.5%), ciprofloxacin (89.3%), and nalidixic acid (60.3%). Neither the antibiotic nor the route of administration had an effect (p > 0.05) on the prevalence of AMR Campylobacter in the feces of piglets.

Funder

National Pork Board

USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Virology,Microbiology (medical),Microbiology

Reference67 articles.

1. ECDC/EFSA/EMA (2015). ECDC/EFSA/EMA first joint report on the integrated analysis of the consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from humans and food-producing animals. EFSA J., 13, 4006.

2. WHO (2023, November 27). Urgent Health Challenges for the Next Decade. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/photo-story/photo-story-detail/urgent-health-challenges-for-the-next-decade.

3. CDC (2019). Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC.

4. O’Neill, J. (2016). Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: Final report and recommendations. Rev. Antimicrob. Resist., 1–84. Available online: https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_Finalpaper_withcover.pdf.

5. The livestock reservoir for antimicrobial resistance: A personal view on changing patterns of risks, effects of interventions and the way forward;Aarestrup;Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3