Hydrological Properties of Soil and Litter Layers of Four Forest Types Restored in the Gully Erosion Area of Latosol in South China
Author:
Tu Zhihua12ORCID, Chen Suyi1, Chen Zexian1, Ruan Dongshuo1, Zhang Wei1, Han Yujie1, Han Lin1, Wang Kang1, Huang Yanping1, Chen Jinhui123ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Key Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China 2. Engineering Research Center of Rare and Precious Tree Species in Hainan Province, Haikou 570228, China 3. Sanya Nanfan Research Institute, Hainan University, Sanya 572025, China
Abstract
Litter and soil play an important role in influencing hydrological processes and the global water cycle. Artificial afforestation, as a part of vegetation restoration, was constructed in the gully erosion areas of latosol with the objective to prevent erosion. Variations in the hydrological properties in soils that have undergone vegetation restoration from gully erosion are not well understood. In this study, we examine the variations in the litter thickness and mass, soil structure and porosity, and hydrological properties of four forest types (eucalyptus–grass forest, bamboo–grass forest, acacia–grass forest, and shrub–grass forest). The results show that the total litter thickness varied from 1.71 to 3.74 cm and was highest in the acacia–grass forest. The total litter mass for the acacia–grass forest, 3.49 ± 0.06 t·ha−1, was significantly higher than that for the other forest types. The mass of the undecomposed litter (UL) layer was significantly lower than that of the semi-decomposed litter (SL). (2) The maximum water-retention capacity (Wmax) and effective water-retention capacity (Weff) of the SL layer were greater than those of the UL layer. The Wmax and Weff for the acacia–grass forest were markedly larger than those of the eucalyptus–grass, bamboo–grass, and shrub–grass forests. The water absorption rates of the SL and UL layers were highest during the onset of the immersion experiment, declined exponentially with time, and declined rapidly in the first 2 h. (4) The soil bulk density ranged from 1.46 g·cm−3 to 1.54 g·cm−3, and the total porosity ranged from 32.06% to 37.13%. The soil bulk density increased with the increasing soil depth, while the total porosity decreased gradually. The soil water-holding capacity of the soil layer of 0–60 cm in the acacia–grass forest (301.76 t·ha−1) was greater than that of the other forest types. A comprehensive evaluation of the water conservation capacity by the entropy weight method showed that the water conservation capacity was greatest in the acacia–grass forest. The higher water-holding capacity of the acacia–grass forest may be more effective in enhancing rainfall interception, minimizing splash erosion, and decreasing surface runoff. Here, the results indicate that acacia–grass forest restoration can mitigate soil erosion by favoring soil and water conservation, improving the environment in the gully erosion area of latosol.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China Scientific Research Fund of Hainan University Fund of Department of Water Resources of Hainan Province
Reference57 articles.
1. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion;Borrelli;Nat. Commun.,2017 2. Xia, J., Zhang, L., Ge, P., Lu, X., Wei, Y., Cai, C., and Wang, J. (2022). Structure degradation induced by wetting and drying cycles for the hilly granitic soils in collapsing gully erosion areas. Forests, 13. 3. Zhang, L., Xiao, T., Liu, H., Ge, P., Xia, J., Dai, C., Zhang, W., and Zhao, X. (2022). Effects of AM fungi and grass strips on soil erosion characteristics in red sandstone erosion areas in Southern China. Forests, 13. 4. A systematic review of soil erosion control practices on the agri-cultural land in Asia;Ahmad;Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res.,2020 5. Have anthropogenic factors miti-gated or intensified soil erosion over the past three decades in South China?;Li;J. Environ. Manag.,2022
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|