Assessing the Prediction Accuracy of Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence, Shannon Entropy, and Information Value Methods for Landslide Susceptibility in the Siwalik Hills of Nepal

Author:

Bhandari Bharat Prasad1,Dhakal Subodh2ORCID,Tsou Ching-Ying3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal

2. Department of Geology, Tri-Chandra Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal

3. Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science, Hirosaki University, Aomori 036-8561, Japan

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to assess the prediction and success rate based on bivariate frequency ratio (FR), weight of evidence (WoE), Shannon entropy (SE), and information value (IV) models for landslide susceptibility in the sedimentary terrain of Nepal Himalaya, as the area is facing threat for sustainable development as well as sustainable resource management. This study also seeks to evaluate the causative factors for landslide susceptibility. Initially, a landslide inventory map was created, consisting of 1158 polygons. These polygons were randomly divided into two sets, with a ratio of 70% for training and 30% for testing data. The multicollinearity approach was evaluated to assess the relevance of selected conditioning variables and their inclusion in the model construction process. The area under the curve (AUC) and other arithmetic evaluation methods were employed to validate and compare the outcomes of the models. In comparison, the predictive accuracy of the FR model surpasses that of the IV and SE models. The success rates, ranked in descending order, are as follows: WoE (79.9%), FR (75.3%), IV (74.4%), and SE (73.2%). Similarly, the success rates of four distinct models, namely WoE, FR, IV, and SE, are 85%, 78.75%, 78.57%, and 77.2%, correspondingly. All models have an accuracy and prediction rate exceeding 70%, making them suitable for assessing landslide susceptibility in the Siwalik Hills of Nepal. Nevertheless, the weight of evidence model provides more precise outcomes than other models. This study is expected to provide important information for road and settlement sustainability in the study area.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference48 articles.

1. GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling: A comparison between fuzzy multi-criteria and machine learning algorithms;Ali;Geosci. Front.,2021

2. Cruden, D.M., and Varnes, D.J. (1996). Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation. Chapter 3-Landslide Types and Processes, Transportation Research Board. Transportation Research Board Special Report.

3. Hussain, Y., Cardenas-Soto, M., Martino, S., Moreira, C., Borges, W., Hamza, O., and Martinez-Carvajal, H. (2019). Multiple geophysical techniques for investigation and monitoring of Sobradinho landslide, Brazil. Sustainability, 11.

4. Spatial and temporal landslide distributions using global and open landslide databases;Nat. Hazards,2023

5. Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA) (2021). Nepal Disaster Report 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3