Affiliation:
1. German Aerospace Center, Institute of Transportation Systems, 12489 Berlin, Germany
2. German Aerospace Center, Institute of Transportation Systems, 38108 Braunschweig, Germany
Abstract
At intersections, road users need to comprehend the intentions of others while also implicitly expressing their own intentions using dynamic information. Identifying patterns of this implicit communication between human drivers and vulnerable road users (VRUs) at intersections could enhance automated driving functions (ADFs), enabling more human-like communication with VRUs. To this end, we conducted a coupled vehicle–bicycle simulator study to investigate interactions between right-turning motorists and crossing cyclists. This involved 34 participants (17 pairs of motorists and cyclists) encountering each other in a virtual intersection. The analysis focused on identifying interaction patterns between motorists and cyclists, specifically aiming to discern which patterns were more likely to be accepted by both parties. We found that in CM (vehicles overtaking), the post-encroachment time (PET) and the average speed of vehicles were higher than in the other two interaction patterns: C (bicycles always in front) and CMC (bicycles overtake). However, subjective ratings indicated that CM was viewed as more critical and less cooperative. Furthermore, this study unveiled the influence of crossing order and overtaking position on subjective ratings through ordered logistic regressions, suggesting that earlier overtaking could improve cyclists’ acceptance of the interaction. These findings may contribute to the optimization of communication strategies for ADF, thereby ensuring safety in interactions with VRUs.
Funder
German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference30 articles.
1. Defining interactions: A conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic;Markkula;Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci.,2020
2. Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic: Implications for automated vehicles;Lee;Cogn. Technol. Work.,2020
3. Higgs, B., Abbas, M., and Medina, A. (2011). Analysis of the Wiedemann Car Following Model over Different Speeds Using Naturalistic Data. [Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Tech].
4. Stanton, N.A. (2018). Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, Springer International Publishing.
5. Šucha, M. (2014, January 14–17). Road Users’ Strategies and Communication: Driver-Pedestrian Interaction. Proceedings of the Transport Research Arena (TRA), Paris, France.