Interaction Patterns of Motorists and Cyclists at Intersections: Insight from a Vehicle–Bicycle Simulator Study

Author:

Zhang Meng1ORCID,Quante Laura2,Gröne Kilian2,Schießl Caroline2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. German Aerospace Center, Institute of Transportation Systems, 12489 Berlin, Germany

2. German Aerospace Center, Institute of Transportation Systems, 38108 Braunschweig, Germany

Abstract

At intersections, road users need to comprehend the intentions of others while also implicitly expressing their own intentions using dynamic information. Identifying patterns of this implicit communication between human drivers and vulnerable road users (VRUs) at intersections could enhance automated driving functions (ADFs), enabling more human-like communication with VRUs. To this end, we conducted a coupled vehicle–bicycle simulator study to investigate interactions between right-turning motorists and crossing cyclists. This involved 34 participants (17 pairs of motorists and cyclists) encountering each other in a virtual intersection. The analysis focused on identifying interaction patterns between motorists and cyclists, specifically aiming to discern which patterns were more likely to be accepted by both parties. We found that in CM (vehicles overtaking), the post-encroachment time (PET) and the average speed of vehicles were higher than in the other two interaction patterns: C (bicycles always in front) and CMC (bicycles overtake). However, subjective ratings indicated that CM was viewed as more critical and less cooperative. Furthermore, this study unveiled the influence of crossing order and overtaking position on subjective ratings through ordered logistic regressions, suggesting that earlier overtaking could improve cyclists’ acceptance of the interaction. These findings may contribute to the optimization of communication strategies for ADF, thereby ensuring safety in interactions with VRUs.

Funder

German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference30 articles.

1. Defining interactions: A conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic;Markkula;Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci.,2020

2. Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic: Implications for automated vehicles;Lee;Cogn. Technol. Work.,2020

3. Higgs, B., Abbas, M., and Medina, A. (2011). Analysis of the Wiedemann Car Following Model over Different Speeds Using Naturalistic Data. [Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Tech].

4. Stanton, N.A. (2018). Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, Springer International Publishing.

5. Šucha, M. (2014, January 14–17). Road Users’ Strategies and Communication: Driver-Pedestrian Interaction. Proceedings of the Transport Research Arena (TRA), Paris, France.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3