Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic: implications for automated vehicles

Author:

Lee Yee MunORCID,Madigan Ruth,Giles Oscar,Garach-Morcillo Laura,Markkula Gustav,Fox Charles,Camara Fanta,Rothmueller Markus,Vendelbo-Larsen Signe Alexandra,Rasmussen Pernille Holm,Dietrich Andre,Nathanael Dimitris,Portouli Villy,Schieben Anna,Merat Natasha

Abstract

AbstractTo be successful, automated vehicles (AVs) need to be able to manoeuvre in mixed traffic in a way that will be accepted by road users, and maximises traffic safety and efficiency. A likely prerequisite for this success is for AVs to be able to communicate effectively with other road users in a complex traffic environment. The current study, conducted as part of the European project interACT, investigates the communication strategies used by drivers and pedestrians while crossing the road at six observed locations, across three European countries. In total, 701 road user interactions were observed and annotated, using an observation protocol developed for this purpose. The observation protocols identified 20 event categories, observed from the approaching vehicles/drivers and pedestrians. These included information about movement, looking behaviour, hand gestures, and signals used, as well as some demographic data. These observations illustrated that explicit communication techniques, such as honking, flashing headlights by drivers, or hand gestures by drivers and pedestrians, rarely occurred. This observation was consistent across sites. In addition, a follow-on questionnaire, administered to a sub-set of the observed pedestrians after crossing the road, found that when contemplating a crossing, pedestrians were more likely to use vehicle-based behaviour, rather than communication cues from the driver. Overall, the findings suggest that vehicle-based movement information such as yielding cues are more likely to be used by pedestrians while crossing the road, compared to explicit communication cues from drivers, although some cultural differences were observed. The implications of these findings are discussed with respect to design of suitable external interfaces and communication of intent by future automated vehicles.

Funder

European Union's Horizon 2020

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy

Reference57 articles.

1. Ackermann C, Beggiato M, Bluhm L-F, Krems J (2018) Vehicle movement and its potential as implicit communication signal for pedestrians and automated vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 6th humanist conference, (June), 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.humanist-vce.eu/fileadmin/contributeurs/humanist/TheHague2018/3-Ackerman.pdf

2. Alberta Transportation (2013) Traffic Safety in Alberta: 2013–2015 Communications Strategy. Retrieved from http://www.transportation.alberta.ca/Content/docType48/Production/OTSCommsStrategy13-15.pdf on 4/3/2019

3. Alessandrini A, Campagna A, Site PD, Filippi F, Persia L (2015) Automated vehicles and the rethinking of mobility and cities. Transp Res Proc 5:145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.01.002

4. Arizona Department of Transportation (2018) Arizona Driver License Manual and customer service guide. Retrived from https://www.azdot.gov/docs/default-source/mvd-forms-pubs/99-0117.pdf on 4/3/2019

5. California Department of Motor Vehicles (2015) California driver handbook—laws and rules of the road. Retrieved from https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/pubs/hdbk/right_of_way on 4/3/2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3