Improving Crop Health, Performance, and Quality in Organic Spring Wheat Production: The Need to Understand Interactions between Pedoclimatic Conditions, Variety, and Fertilization
Author:
Wilkinson Andrew12, Wilkinson John N.1, Shotton Peter2, Sufar Enas Khalid2ORCID, Hasanaliyeva Gultekin2ORCID, Volakakis Nikolaos23, Cakmak Ismail4ORCID, Ozturk Levent4, Bilsborrow Paul25, Iversen Per Ole67ORCID, Wilcockson Steve2, Rempelos Leonidas28ORCID, Leifert Carlo69ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Gilchester Organics, Stamfordham NE18 0QL, UK 2. Nafferton Ecological Farming Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK 3. Geokomi Plc, Sivas Festos, 70200 Crete, Greece 4. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, 34956 Istanbul, Turkey 5. School of Natural and Environmental Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK 6. Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences (IMB), University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway 7. Department of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway 8. Lincoln Institute for Agri-Food Technology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN2 2LG, UK 9. SCU Plant Science, Southern Cross University, Military Rd., Lismore 2480, Australia
Abstract
Organic wheat production systems have lower yields compared with intensive conventional production and often do not achieve the grain protein content and quality thresholds set by millers and bakers. In contrast, organic production methods were reported to result in higher concentrations of nutritionally desirable micronutrients and lower concentrations of the toxic metal Cd in wheat grain and wholegrain flour. However, although N-availability and variety characteristics are known to affect both gain yields and bread-making quality, the exact reasons for the yield gap and differences in grain processing and nutritional quality between organic and conventional spring wheat production in the UK are poorly understood. The overall aim of this study was therefore to determine to what extent changes in variety choice and fertilization regimes may reduce the yield gap and improve processing quality without affecting nutritional quality in organic spring wheat production. To achieve this aim, we compared crop health, yield, grain processing, and nutritional quality parameters in spring wheat produced using (i) six contrasting spring wheat varieties grown with a standard fertilization regime and (ii) one variety widely used by organic farmers (Paragon) with nine different fertilization regimes in (iii) three UK sites/farms with contrasting pedoclimatic conditions. Significant differences in foliar disease severity, grain yield, and quality parameters were detected between six contrasting spring wheat varieties when grown under organic management regimes. Specifically, the varieties Paragon and Tybalt were identified as the best-performing varieties with respect to foliar disease resistance and grain yield under organic farming conditions and also produced high processing and nutritional quality across the three UK sites. However, the highest grain yields were obtained by Paragon at the Gilchester site and Tybalt at the Sheepdrove and Courtyard sites, while the highest protein contents were produced by Tybalt at the Gilchester site and Paragon at the Sheepdrove and Courtyard sites, which suggests that there is a need for site-specific wheat variety selection in the UK organic sector. Although organic fertilizer input type and level also affected wheat performance, differences between fertilization regimes were smaller than those observed between the five contrasting varieties, which suggests that improvements in spring wheat breeding/selection have a greater potential for increasing crop yield and quality in the organic sector compared with changes to fertilization practices. Overall, results suggest it is feasible to breed/select spring wheat varieties that combine high protein, vitamin E, and micronutrients with low toxic metal (Cd, Pb) concentrations when produced under organic farming conditions. These findings also support the hypothesis that differences in variety choice by organic and conventional farmers have contributed to the differences in nutritional quality between organic and conventional wheat products reported in previous studies.
Funder
European Union Integrated Project Quality Low Input Food DEFRA LINK Gilchester Organics Ltd.
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference60 articles.
1. The need to breed crop varieties suitable for organic farming, using wheat, tomato and broccoli as examples: A review;Jones;NJAS-Wagen. J. Life Sc.,2010 2. Towards resilience through systems-based plant breeding. A review;Struik;Agron. Sustain. Dev.,2018 3. Rempelos, L., Wang, J., Sufar, E.K., Almuayrifi, M.S.B., Knutt, D., Leifert, H., Leifert, A., Wilkinson, A., Shotton, P., and Hasanaliyeva, G. (2023). Breeding Bread-Making Wheat Varieties for Organic Farming Systems: The Need to Target Productivity, Robustness, Resource Use Efficiency and Grain Quality Traits. Foods, 12. 4. Wang, J., Baranski, M., Korkut, R., Kalee, H.A., Wood, L., Bilsborrow, P., Janovska, D., Leifert, A., Winter, S., and Willson, A. (2021). Performance of Modern and Traditional Spelt Wheat (Triticum spelta) Varieties in Rain-Fed and Irrigated, Organic and Conventional Production Systems in a Semi-Arid Environment; Results from Exploratory Field Experiments in Crete, Greece. Agronomy, 11. 5. Effect of irrigation, fertiliser type and variety choice on grain yield and nutritional quality parameters in spelt wheat (Triticum spelta) grown under semi-arid conditions;Wang;Food Chem.,2021
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|