Consumers’ Preferences for Chicken Fed on Different Processed Animal Proteins: A Best–Worst Analysis in Italy

Author:

Amato Mario1ORCID,Demartini Eugenio2ORCID,Gaviglio Anna2ORCID,Marescotti Maria Elena2ORCID,Verneau Fabio1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, Via Rodinò 22, 80138 Napoli, Italy

2. Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences (DIVAS), University of Milan, Via dell’Università, 6, 26900 Lodi, Italy

Abstract

The increase in meat consumption expected in the next decade will require more and more proteins for animal feeding. The recent amendments to the European “BSE Regulation” allow the use of insects and porcine-based meals in poultry farming, providing novel, sustainable substitutes for vegetable fodder. While the technological and nutritional properties of novel feeds containing processed animal proteins are widely recognized, far less is known about consumers’ acceptance of meat produced by animals fed on animal-based meals. In the present research, a best–worst survey was applied to estimate consumers’ preferences for chicken fed on plants, insects, or porcine-based meals using a sample of 205 Italian consumers. Furthermore, product price, type of farming, and “Free-from” labeling were considered in the analysis to evaluate the relative importance of feed ingredients compared to other important attributes of meats. The results show that the most relevant attributes are type of farming and “Free-from” claims, while type of feed represents the third attribute in order of importance. Notably, both insect and porcine flour are considered as negative characteristics of the product, suggesting that mandatory labeling signaling the use of these feeds would negatively impact on the value of chicken meat.

Funder

University of Milan—Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Food Science,Nutrition and Dietetics

Reference60 articles.

1. World meat consumption patterns: An overview of the last fifty years (1961–2011);Sans;Meat Sci.,2015

2. Whitnall, T., and Pitts, N. (2023, March 10). Meat Consumption, Available online: https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/research-topics/agricultural-outlook/meat-consumption.

3. Global trends in meat consumption;Whitnall;Agric. Commod.,2019

4. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security;Annu. Rev. Èntomol.,2013

5. Sogari, G., Amato, M., Biasato, I., Chiesa, S., and Gasco, L. (2019). the potential role of insects as feed: A multi-perspective review. Animals, 9.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3