Student’s Choice: In-Person, Online, or on Demand? A Comparison of Instructional Modality Preference and Effectiveness

Author:

Larson Melissa1ORCID,Davies Randall1ORCID,Steadman Anna2,Cheng Wai Man2

Affiliation:

1. Instructional Phychology & Technology, Brigham Young University, Provo Utah, UT 84602, USA

2. Educational Inquiry Measurement and Evaluation, Brigham Young University, Provo Utah, UT 84602, USA

Abstract

The recent increase in online instruction caused by the 2020 pandemic has reignited the debate over the efficacy of online instruction compared to in-person instruction. This study explored the impact various modes of instruction had on student achievement and compared students’ stated modality preference with their actual attendance behavior. Results show that while most students preferred in-person instruction (74%), only 47% of those who indicated they preferred in-person instruction attended class only in-person. Many attended classes utilizing a modality other than in-person, and several students switched their preferred modality away from in-person instruction. In general, students who attended class using a mixed modality or in-person achieved slightly better results than those attending class live online. However, the only statistically significant difference was between those participating predominantly in person and those watching class recordings (88% compared to 84% on average). Overall, many students achieved high grades regardless of their chosen instructional modality. In addition, students reported appreciating the option of multiple modalities when they could not attend class in their preferred modality. These results suggest offering a choice of modalities benefited many students.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference31 articles.

1. Moore, M.G., and Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning, Cengage Learning.

2. Visions shaping the future of online education: Understanding its historical evolution, implications, and assumptions;Gaytan;Online J. Distance Learn. Adm.,2007

3. Distance education: Better, worse, or as good as traditional education;Tucker;Online J. Distance Learn. Adm.,2001

4. Altindag, D.T., Filiz, E.S., and Tekin, E. (2021). Is Online Education Working? (No. w29113), National Bureau of Economic Research.

5. What drives student success? Assessing the combined effect of transfer students and online courses;Glazier;Teach. High. Educ.,2021

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Description and Evaluation of a Pharmacy Graduate Health Services Research Methods Course;Pharmacy;2024-08-21

2. IT professionals’ post-pandemic online learning: UTAUT model study;Journal of Workplace Learning;2024-08-19

3. Comprehensive study on deep-learning-based online course review analysis;Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Information Education and Artificial Intelligence;2023-12-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3