Plants Are Not Boring, School Botany Is

Author:

Kletečki Nataša1,Hruševar Dario2ORCID,Mitić Božena2ORCID,Šorgo Andrej3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Elementary School Bogumil Toni, Perkovčeva 90, HR-10430 Samobor, Croatia

2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Horvatovac 102a, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia

3. Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Koroška Cesta 160, Sl-2000 Maribor, Slovenia

Abstract

The quality of botanical education depends on the quality and interests of the teacher. The aim of our paper was to conduct an initial study on the attitudes of primary and secondary school teachers about plants and botany. We initiated a study in which 211 biology and 168 teachers of different subjects, from primary to secondary schools in Croatia, participated on a voluntary basis. Statistical analysis was processed using jamovi 2.3 software. Teachers of all profiles (biology and others) had similar attitudes: high opinion about the importance of plants for life and education but not about school botany; botany was in the middle of their scale for potential exclusion from education. The last part of the survey referred only to biology teachers and their interests and suggestions for increasing the attractiveness of botany as a subject. The results showed that botany was the least popular, and within it, teachers were most interested in ecology and horticulture. They suggested that botany would be more interesting with active teaching methods and references to everyday contexts; however, it remains unclear why that is so, as the level of autonomy they are given does enable them to introduce such changes.

Funder

Slovenian Research Agency and the Croatian Ministry of Science and Education

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference34 articles.

1. Hattie, J.A.C. (2003, January 19–21). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence?. Proceedings of the Building Teacher Quality: What Does the Research Tell Us ACER Research Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Available online: https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=research_conference_2003.

2. Mourshed, M., and Barber, M. (2007). How the World’s Best-Performing School Systems Come Out on Top, McKinsey and Company.

3. Challenges facing plant biology teaching programs;Bozniak;Plant Sci. Lett.,1994

4. Plant neglect in biology education;Hershey;BioScience,1993

5. Pany, P., Meier, F.D., Dünser, B., Yanagida, T., Kiehn, M., and Möller, A. (2022). Measuring Students’ Plant Awareness: A Prerequisite for Effective Botany Education. J. Biol. Educ.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3