Persistence of Conceptual Errors in First-Year University Physics Course and Its Possible Relationship with Learning Styles

Author:

Ablanque Javier1,Revuelta Fabio1ORCID,Losada Juan Carlos1ORCID,Benito Rosa M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Grupo de Innovación Educativa “Física Interactiva” and Grupo de Sistemas Complejos, E. T. S. Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Abstract

In this work, we study the persistence of some fundamental previous ideas in physics in a group of freshmen at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (Spain). For this purpose, we analyze the answers to a questionnaire consisted of 24 multiple-choice items, most of them borrowed from the Force Concept Inventory (FCI). Our study is performed in two different ways by using, on the one hand, classical test theory and, on the other hand, the Pearson product–moment correlation. The survivance of some of the previous ideas at the end of the course is assessed by comparing and critically analyzing the answers of the students to the same test at the beginning and the end of the term. A possible connection with Honey–Alonso learning styles (LS) is also discussed. The results yielded by our study demonstrate the persistence of some of the initial and previous ideas, no matter the students’ previous qualifications or their current LS.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference80 articles.

1. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement, Routledge. [1st ed.].

2. Students’ Learning Characteristics, Perceptions of Small-Group University Teaching, and Understanding through a “Meeting of Minds”;Karagiannopoulou;Front. Psychol.,2019

3. The kinds of mental representations -models, propositions and images- used by college physics students regarding the concept of field;Greca;Int. J. Sci. Educ.,1997

4. Bachelard, G., and McAllester, J.M. (2002). The Formation of the Scientific Mind: A Contribution to a Psychoanalysis of Objective Knowledge, Clinamen Press.

5. Relationships between everyday knowledge and scientific knowledge: Understanding how matter changes;Pozo;Int. J. Sci. Educ.,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3