Students’ Strategies When Dealing with Science-Based Information in Social Media—A Group Discussion Study

Author:

Belova NadjaORCID,Krause Moritz,Siemens Christopher

Abstract

As the world becomes increasingly complex, students must learn how to critically evaluate media messages and facts. Young people often obtain information from social media. Due to the ease with which information can be spread through such media, science misinformation is more prevalent. Learning how to critically evaluate information is expected to develop students’ abilities to critically evaluate science and media content. Group discussions were conducted with 33 secondary school students in northern Germany to examine (1) their experiences with social media in the (science) classroom, (2) their strategies for dealing with science-based information in the media, and (3) their perception of the role of social media in the science classroom. Qualitative coding revealed that students frequently use social media for information purposes, both in school and privately, and perceive social media as relevant to science education. In social media, they are successful at applying general media literacy and IT strategies, but struggle with science-related strategies. This study suggests that more opportunities should be provided for students to critique science information, and a greater focus should be placed on educating students about evaluation skills and scientific reasoning.

Funder

Joachim Herz Stiftung

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference49 articles.

1. Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices;Bybee,1997

2. Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education;Roberts,2014

3. Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006;OECD,2006

4. A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3