Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
2. Faculty of Education, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg P.O. Box 524, South Africa
Abstract
Traditional educational research has been criticized for the gap between the research and practice communities, meaning that outcomes do not transfer to educational praxis. To meet this challenge, policymakers, funders, and researchers are developing research–practice partnerships (RPPs). The purpose of this research is to study the research–practice partnership as a strategy for educational transformation in the Finnish educational context. This study highlights the multifaceted perspectives of key RPP stakeholders: teachers, principals, municipality administrators, and researchers. Their experiences were explored through semi-structured interviews. The data were examined through content analysis and categorized into themes depicting the goals and goal-setting process in RPPs, the experiences of RPP activities, and the factors facilitating and challenging RPPs. The results show that stakeholders viewed the goals through the perspectives of professional development; supporting the growth and learning of students; and developing school, municipality, and research practices. Regular participation solidified the commitment to the RPP process. Horizontal interaction worked well between stakeholders, but challenges arose with vertical interaction. We found multiple roles for researchers and municipality administrators. Researchers found that they take on a new role in RPPs as change agents and facilitators. Regarding the facilitating or challenging aspects of RPPs, an open and flexible attitude and atmosphere and readiness for change are demanded on all actor levels. Mutual appreciation and sensitivity facilitate RPP activities. We propose taking all stakeholder perspectives into account when designing RPPs aimed at systemic change and that RPP processes should facilitate both horizontal and vertical interaction.
Funder
Strategic Research Council
Reference32 articles.
1. Mapping roles in research-practice partnerships—A systematic literature review;Lindvall;Educ. Rev.,2022
2. Are research–practice partnerships responsive to partners’ needs? Exploring research activities during the COVID-19 pandemic;Klein;Educ. Policy,2023
3. Philippakos, Z.A., Howell, E., and Pellegrino, A. (2021). Design-Based Research in Education Theory and Applications, Guilford Press.
4. Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research;Sandoval;J. Learn. Sci.,2014
5. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., Mc Kenney, S., and Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational Design Research, Routledge.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献