Creating Transformative Research–Practice Partnership in Collaboration with School, City, and University Actors

Author:

Korhonen Tiina1ORCID,Salo Laura1ORCID,Reinius Hanna1ORCID,Malander Sanni1,Tiippana Netta1ORCID,Laakso Noora1,Lavonen Jari12,Hakkarainen Kai1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland

2. Faculty of Education, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg P.O. Box 524, South Africa

Abstract

Traditional educational research has been criticized for the gap between the research and practice communities, meaning that outcomes do not transfer to educational praxis. To meet this challenge, policymakers, funders, and researchers are developing research–practice partnerships (RPPs). The purpose of this research is to study the research–practice partnership as a strategy for educational transformation in the Finnish educational context. This study highlights the multifaceted perspectives of key RPP stakeholders: teachers, principals, municipality administrators, and researchers. Their experiences were explored through semi-structured interviews. The data were examined through content analysis and categorized into themes depicting the goals and goal-setting process in RPPs, the experiences of RPP activities, and the factors facilitating and challenging RPPs. The results show that stakeholders viewed the goals through the perspectives of professional development; supporting the growth and learning of students; and developing school, municipality, and research practices. Regular participation solidified the commitment to the RPP process. Horizontal interaction worked well between stakeholders, but challenges arose with vertical interaction. We found multiple roles for researchers and municipality administrators. Researchers found that they take on a new role in RPPs as change agents and facilitators. Regarding the facilitating or challenging aspects of RPPs, an open and flexible attitude and atmosphere and readiness for change are demanded on all actor levels. Mutual appreciation and sensitivity facilitate RPP activities. We propose taking all stakeholder perspectives into account when designing RPPs aimed at systemic change and that RPP processes should facilitate both horizontal and vertical interaction.

Funder

Strategic Research Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference32 articles.

1. Mapping roles in research-practice partnerships—A systematic literature review;Lindvall;Educ. Rev.,2022

2. Are research–practice partnerships responsive to partners’ needs? Exploring research activities during the COVID-19 pandemic;Klein;Educ. Policy,2023

3. Philippakos, Z.A., Howell, E., and Pellegrino, A. (2021). Design-Based Research in Education Theory and Applications, Guilford Press.

4. Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research;Sandoval;J. Learn. Sci.,2014

5. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., Mc Kenney, S., and Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational Design Research, Routledge.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3