Investigating Online versus Face-to-Face Course Dropout: Why Do Students Say They Are Leaving?

Author:

Hachey Alyse C.1,Wladis Claire23ORCID,Conway Katherine M.4

Affiliation:

1. Teacher Education Department, College of Education, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79902, USA

2. Mathematics Department, Borough of Manhattan Community College, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10007, USA

3. Urban Education Department, Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, USA

4. Business Administration Department, Borough of Manhattan Community College, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10007, USA

Abstract

Despite more focused attention in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, high online attrition remains both a concern and a mystery; gaps in our knowledge exist as to why students so often do not complete online courses. Pre-pandemic, and using a sample of 780 students who dropped out of fully online courses (or the same course face-to-face) from a large university system in the Northeast U.S., students were explicitly asked about their specific reasons for course withdrawal. All students enrolled in a fully online course (or a face-to-face section of the same course) at the City University of New York (CUNY) in fall 2015 were invited to take the online survey from which this study data was taken. Results indicate that there were distinct differences in the patterns of reasons given by online and face-to-face students: although the perceived quality of the instructor/instruction was deemed important to student persistence in both modalities, it seemed to be of greater importance face-to-face than online. Furthermore, issues related to time were found to be more prominent reasons for dropping for online learners than face-to-face learners. Findings from this study shed new light on the impetus for online attrition, with implications for online policy and course design in a post-pandemic era.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference96 articles.

1. Seaman, J.E., Allen, I.E., and Seaman, J. (2023, September 01). Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States. Available online: https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradeincrease.pdf.

2. More than inconvenienced: The unique needs of U.S. student during the COVID-19 pandemic;Lederer;Health Educ. Behav.,2021

3. Johnson, H., and Mejia, M.C. (2014). Online Learning and Student Outcomes in California’s Community Colleges, Public Policy Institute of California.

4. Post-secondary online learning in the U.S.: An integrative review of the literature on undergraduate student characteristics;Hachey;J. Comput. High. Educ.,2022

5. Smith, N.D. (2016). Examining the Effects of College Courses on Student Outcomes Using a Joint Nearest Neighbor Matching Procedure on a State-Wide University System, North Carolina State University. Available online: https://aefpweb.org/sites/default/files/webform/41/NicholeDSmith_ExaminingOnline.pdf.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3