Exploring the Online and Blended Modes of Learning for Post-COVID-19: A Study of Higher Education Institutions

Author:

Sharma Lavina1,Shree Sonal2

Affiliation:

1. Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Bengaluru, Symbiosis International University, Pune 412115, India

2. Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Pune, Symbiosis International University, Pune 412115, India

Abstract

The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic brought a tectonic shift in the otherwise traditional education sector. The classroom teaching approach, which has been followed in educational institutions for a long time, suddenly shifted to include e-learning through virtual platforms. Technological savviness is no longer a choice. As institutions were contemplating opening their campuses to students, they faced a dilemma to include a mode of learning that could impact the students positively and increase their overall learning effectiveness. At the same time, a total online mode of learning was not inclusive enough for the learners without access to seamless internet connectivity. In this context, the present study aims to draw a comparison between the three modes of learning: face-to-face education, online learning, and blended learning. The difference in the three modes of learning was assessed on the content of the course, facilitation, perceived value, and learning effectiveness. The data for the study were collected from 119 students studying in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). The study’s findings suggest a significant difference between the three modes of learning in terms of facilitation, perceived value, and learning effectiveness. However, the results also suggest that there was no significant difference between the three modes in terms of content. While content creates a more substantial impact through some parameters in one particular mode of learning, it does not create a similar impact through others. The study also delves into a pairwise comparison of each construct’s learning modes that have shown a significant difference. The results can guide institutions towards choosing a suitable mode of learning for the students by considering a holistic approach.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3