Affiliation:
1. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2. Baotianman Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Nanyang, Henan 474365, China
Abstract
Enunciating the carbon storage across various types of forests is a precondition for comprehending forest ecosystem carbon cycling. However, previous studies regarding forest carbon storage were primarily conducted in the general temperature zones, with a limited understanding of carbon storage in different forest types within climate transition zones. In this study, we employed biomass models to explore the carbon storage in three types of natural secondary forests (Pinus armandii forest, Quercus aliena forest, and Q. aliena–P. armandii mixed forest) in the transition zone between the northern subtropical and warm temperate regions of China. Furthermore, we used the variance decomposition analysis and random forest model to determine the key factors influencing carbon storage in three types of natural secondary forests. Our results indicated that the carbon storage of wood and soil layers in the Q. aliena–P. armandii mixed forest was significantly higher than that in the P. armandii and Q. aliena forests. Total carbon storage was ranked as follows: Q. aliena–P. armandii mixed forest (266.09 t/ha) > P. armandii forest (222.89 t/ha) > Q. aliena forest (212.46 t/ha). Our results also revealed that carbon storage of the wood layer was jointly regulated by environmental factors, plant physiological characteristics, and soil properties, while soil carbon storage was mainly affected by soil properties. These results highlight the significant advantages of mixed conifer–broadleaf forests in carbon storage, emphasizing the importance of mixed natural secondary forests in carbon cycling and ecosystem services. This study provides scientific evidence for enhancing forest carbon sink functions and developing forest conservation and management policies to combat climate change.
Funder
National Key R&D Program of China
National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant of CAF
Reference80 articles.
1. FAO, and UNEP (2020). The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, Biodiversity and People, Sprep Library.
2. Budgeting of biomass and carbon stock as ecosystem service from Himalayan dry temperate and alpine forest ecosystem, India;Kumar;Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res.,2023
3. Li, Z.R., Lai, Q., Bao, Y.H., Sude, B., Bao, Z.Y., and Liu, X.Y. (2024). Carbon Allocation to Leaves and Its Controlling Factors and Impacts on Gross Primary Productivity in Forest Ecosystems of Northeast China. Forests, 15.
4. Forest fire management, climate change, and the risk of catastrophic carbon losses;Bowman;Front. Ecol. Environ.,2013
5. Do thinnings influence biomass and soil carbon stocks in Mediterranean maritime pinewoods?;Montero;Eur. J. Forest Res.,2013