Gait Recovery in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review with Metanalysis Involving New Rehabilitative Technologies

Author:

La Rosa Giuseppe1ORCID,Avola Marianna1ORCID,Di Gregorio Tiziana2,Calabrò Rocco Salvatore3ORCID,Onesta Maria Pia2

Affiliation:

1. Consorzio Siciliano di Riabilitazione, 95100 Catania, Italy

2. Unità Spinale Unipolare, AO Cannizzaro, 98102 Catania, Italy

3. IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, 98124 Messina, Italy

Abstract

Gait recovery is a fundamental goal in patients with spinal cord injury to attain greater autonomy and quality of life. Robotics is becoming a valid tool in improving motor, balance, and gait function in this patient population. Moreover, other innovative approaches are leading to promising results. The aim of this study was to investigate new rehabilitative methods for gait recovery in people who have suffered spinal cord injuries. A systematic review of the last 10 years of the literature was performed in three databases (PubMed, PEDro, andCochrane). We followed this PICO of the review: P: adults with non-progressive spinal cord injury; I: new rehabilitative methods; C: new methods vs. conventional methods; and O: improvement of gait parameters. When feasible, a comparison through ES forest plots was performed. A total of 18 RCTs of the 599 results obtained were included. The studies investigated robotic rehabilitation (n = 10), intermittent hypoxia (N = 3) and external stimulation (N = 5). Six studies of the first group (robotic rehabilitation) were compared using a forest plot for 10MWT, LEMS, WISCI-II, and SCIM-3. The other clinical trials were analyzed through a narrative review of the results. We found weak evidence for the claim that robotic devices lead to better outcomes in gait independence compared to conventional rehabilitation methods. External stimulation and intermittent hypoxia seem to improve gait parameters associated with other rehabilitation methods. Research investigating the role of innovative technologies in improving gait and balance is needed since walking ability is a fundamental issue in patients with SCI.

Funder

Italian Ministry of Health—Current Research 2022

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Neuroscience

Reference70 articles.

1. (2020, September 24). Spinal Cord Injury. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spinal-cord-injury.

2. Peripheral vascular function in spinal cord injury: A systematic review;West;Spinal Cord,2013

3. Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury;Raineteau;Nat. Rev. Neurosci.,2001

4. Bladder and Sphincter Behavior in Patients with Spinal Cord Lesions;Kaplan;J. Urol.,1991

5. Weaver, L.C., and Polosa, C. (2006). Progress in Brain Research, Elsevier.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3