Affiliation:
1. University of Michigan
Abstract
Abstract
Study design:cross-sectional study
Objective: to examine the differences in satisfaction with social roles and activities among ambulatory individuals, manual wheelchair users, and power wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries (SCIs).
Setting:community setting
Methods:Participants completed surveys of their demographics and clinical data as well as the Spinal Cord Injury – Quality of Life Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities- Short Form. Participants’ mobility status was categorized into 1) ambulatory individuals, 2) independent manual wheelchair users, and 3) power wheelchair/scooter users. One-way ANOVA and ANCOVA were used, respectively, to examine unadjusted and adjusted differences in satisfaction with social roles and activities across mobility status. Adjustment covariates included age, sex, time since SCI, and SCI injury level.
Results:A total of 129 participants (mean age = 47.4 ± 13.6 years, 73 % male) were included in the analyses. Unadjusted (F = 3.8, p = 0.03) and adjusted models (F = 3.4, p = 0.04) evidenced significant differences in satisfaction with social roles and activities according to mobility status . Pairwise Bonferroni Post-Hoc analysis indicated that manual wheelchair users were more satisfied with their social roles and activities when compared to ambulatory individuals (mean difference = 2.8, p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Due to the current challenges associated with walking recovery after SCIs, clinicians may want to discuss the use of wheelchairs with individuals with limited walking ability when the goal is to improve participation and quality of life. Emphasizing alternative means of mobility may enhance satisfaction with social roles and activities.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. NSCISC. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, facts and figures at a glance. University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham; 2016.
2. DeLisa JA, Gans BM, Walsh NE. Physical medicine and rehabilitation: principles and practice: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
3. Determining prognosis after spinal cord injury;Vazquez XM;J Forensic Leg Med,2008
4. Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury;Kirshblum S;Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2004
5. Diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic spinal cord injury;Middendorp JJ;Global Spine J,2011