Measuring the Performance of a Strategic Asset Management Plan through a Balanced Scorecard
-
Published:2023-11-07
Issue:22
Volume:15
Page:15697
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
de-Almeida-e-Pais José Edmundo12ORCID, Raposo Hugo D. N.3ORCID, Farinha José Torres3ORCID, Cardoso Antonio J. Marques2ORCID, Lyubchyk Svitlana1, Lyubchyk Sergiy1
Affiliation:
1. Lusófona University, RCM2+ Research Centre for Asset Management and Systems Engineering, Campo Grande, 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal 2. CISE—Electromechatronic Systems Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal 3. Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Coimbra, Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, RCM2+ Research Centre in Asset Management and System Engineering, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to propose a tool to measure the performance of a Strategic Asset Management Plan (SAMP) based on a Balanced Scorecard (BSC). The SAMP converts organizational objectives into asset management objectives, as well as specifies the role of the asset management system, providing support to achieve asset management objectives. The SAMP becomes the heart of the organization and integrates the long-term, medium-term, and short-term plans. In the SAMP, the balance among performance, costs, and risks are taken into consideration in order to achieve the organization’s objectives. On the other hand, the SAMP is a guide to set the asset management objectives while describing the role of the Asset Management System (AMS) in meeting these objectives. Since the SAMP is the central figure of AMS, it is important to measure its performance and should be built and improved through an iterative process. This indicates that it is not just a document, it is “the document” that should be treated as a “living being”, which needs to adapt to internal and external changes quickly. The BSC is an excellent tool where, through the appropriate Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), the progress can be measured, and is supported by four perspectives: Financial, Customer, Internal Business Process, and Learning and Growth.
Funder
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme European Regional Development Fund Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference126 articles.
1. Uva, J.S. (2023, March 01). ‘6° Inventário Florestal Nacional (IFN6)’, ICNF, Lisbon, Portugal, 2015. Available online: https://www.icnf.pt/api/file/doc/c8cc40b3b7ec8541. 2. Remote sensing of urban areas;Maktav;Int. J. Remote Sens.,2005 3. A global fingerprint of macro-scale changes in urban structure from 1999 to 2009;Frolking;Environ. Res. Lett.,2013 4. Seto, K.C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B., and Reilly, M.K. (2011). A Meta-Analysis of Global Urban Land Expansion. PLoS ONE, 6. 5. Liu, Y., Xu, W., Hong, Z., Wang, L., Ou, G., and Lu, N. (2022). Assessment of Spatial-Temporal Changes of Landscape Ecological Risk in Xishuangbanna, China from 1990 to 2019. Sustainability, 14.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|