Risk Management of Physical Assets Supported by Maintenance Performance Indicators

Author:

da Silva Renan Favarão1ORCID,Melani Arthur Henrique de Andrade2ORCID,Michalski Miguel Angelo de Carvalho2ORCID,Souza Gilberto Francisco Martha de2ORCID,Nabeta Silvio Ikuyo3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Production Engineering Department, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil

2. Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil

3. Department of Electrical Power and Automation Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil

Abstract

Many asset-intensive organizations implement risk management strategies to mitigate potential hazards associated with physical asset failures, such as infrastructure deterioration or mechanical breakdown. As these physical assets’ risks can be treated with maintenance activities, properly evaluating the performance of maintenance management is of interest for risk management. Accordingly, this paper proposes a framework for the determination of Maintenance Performance Indicators (MPIs) to support the risk management of physical assets. The proposed framework included four main processes: Integrate performance evaluation guidelines, Review the maintenance management strategy, Define the performance indicators, and Assess maintenance across the MPIs. The ISO 55000 series for asset management and the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approach were the guidelines considered. The ISO 55001 standard provides three assessment domains for performance evaluation: asset portfolio, asset management, and asset management system. The BSC approach identifies four performance evaluation perspectives that were integrated to address the requirements of one of these asset management domains. Then, the MPIs were defined for each of the performance evaluation domains in line with the maintenance management strategy toward the risk management of physical assets. Through a case study, the proposed framework was demonstrated considering the operational context of a Brazilian hydroelectric power plant. As a result, the proposed framework was shown to be consistent in systematically determining the MPIs that support risk management in organizations.

Funder

Fundação para o Desenvolvimento Tecnológico da Engenharia

Fundação de Apoio à Universidade de São Paulo

Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development/Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference48 articles.

1. Total Safety Management: Principles, Processes and Methods;Kontogiannis;Saf. Sci.,2017

2. Ayyub, B.M. (2014). Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics, CRC Press. [2nd ed.].

3. (2018). Risk Management—Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 31000).

4. Souza, G.F.M., Caminada Netto, A., Melani, A.H.A., Michalski, M.A.C., and da Silva, R.F. (2022). Reliability Analysis and Asset Management of Engineering Systems, Elsevier.

5. The Contemporary Landscape of Asset Management Systems;Konstantakos;Qual. Access Success,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3