Affiliation:
1. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Abstract
Presented in this study is a comparative life cycle assessment of 60 wind plant systems’ GHG intensities (49 of onshore and 11 of offshore) in China with regard to different geographical location, turbine technology and management level. As expected, geographical location and turbine technology affect the results marginally. The result shows that the life-cycle GHG intensities of onshore and offshore cases are 5.84–16.71 g CO2eq/kWh and 13.30–29.45 g CO2eq/kWh, respectively, which could be decreased by 36.41% and 41.30% when recycling materials are considered. With wind power density increasing, the GHG intensities of onshore cases tend to decline, but for offshore cases, the larger GHG intensity is as the offshore distance increases. The GHG intensities of onshore cases present a decreasing trend along with the technical advancement, and offshore counterparts is around 65% higher than the onshore cases in terms of wind turbines rated at more than 3 MW. The enlarging of offshore turbine size does not necessarily bring marginal benefit as onshore counterparts due to the increasing cost from construction and maintenance. After changing the functional unit to 1 kWh on-grid electricity (practical), the highest GHG intensities of Gansu province increase to 17.94 g CO2eq/kWh, same as other wind resource rich provinces, which significantly offsets their wind resource endowment. The results obtained in this study also highlight the necessity for policy interventions in China to enhance resource exploration efficiency and promote robust and sustainable development of the wind power industry.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference61 articles.
1. NEA (2021). China Electric Power Statistical Compilation, NEA.
2. CWP (2022, October 20). Beijing Declaration on Wind Energy, Beijing, China on 14 October 2020. Available online: https://gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Beijing-Declaration-EN.pdf.
3. Environmental implications of large-scale adoption of wind power: A scenario-based life cycle assessment;Arvesen;Environ. Res. Lett.,2011
4. Bi, X., Yang, J., and Yang, S. (2022). LCA-Based Regional Distribution and Transference of Carbon Emissions from Wind Farms in China. Energies, 15.
5. A comprehensive estimate of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from onshore wind energy in China;Xu;J. Clean. Prod.,2022
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献