Abstract
Postharvest losses are a key stumbling block to long-term postharvest storage of potato tubers. Due to the high costs and lack of infrastructure associated with cold storage, this storage method is often not the most viable option. Hence, sprout suppressants are an appealing option. In most developing countries, potato tubers in postharvest storage are accompanied by a rapid decline in the potato tuber quality due to the physiological process of sprouting. It results in weight changes, increased respiration, and decreased nutritional quality. Therefore, proper management of sprouting is critical in potato storage. To avoid tuber sprouting, increased storage and transportation of potatoes demands either the retention of their dormant state or the application of sprout growth suppressants. This review evaluates the current understanding of the efficacy of different sprout suppressants on potato storability and the extension of potato shelf-life. We also consider the implications of varied study parameters, i.e., cultivar, temperature, and method of application, on the outcomes of sprout suppressant efficacies and how these limit the integration of efficient sprout suppression protocols.
Funder
South African National Research Foundation
Subject
Plant Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference69 articles.
1. Global food security, contributions from sustainable potato agri-food systems;Devaux,2020
2. Sweet potato as an alternative food supplement during rice shortage;Zuraida;J. Litbang Pertan.,2003
3. Sweet potato: A review of its past, present, and future role in human nutrition;Bovell-Benjamin,2007
4. ALTERNATIVE COMPOUNDS FOR the MAINTENANCE of PROCESSING QUALITY of STORED POTATOES (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM)
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献